Follow Us:

Flat Purchase Addition Deleted – Creditor Loan Proved; Wife’s Contribution Not Taxable: ITAT Mumbai

February 14, 2026 558 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT held that once identity, genuineness and creditworthiness of the loan creditor were established, addition under Section 69 was unsustainable. The creditors disclosure before the Settlement Commission supported the assessee’s claim.

Reassessment Quashed – Escaped Income Below ₹50 Lakh; Wrong Sanction Authority: ITAT Mumbai

February 14, 2026 735 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT held that under the amended law, reopening after three years is barred where alleged escaped income is under ₹50 lakh. The notice issued under Section 148 was declared invalid and reassessment proceedings were quashed.

Section 69 Addition on Alleged Cash in Property Deal Deleted – Third-Party Evidence Without Cross-Examination Insufficient

February 14, 2026 1062 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT held that Excel sheets recovered from a third party cannot justify addition without direct evidence linking the assessee. In absence of corroboration and cross-examination, the cash investment addition was deleted.

ITAT Kolkata – Section 263 Revision on Deemed Dividend Quashed; Loan Not Taxable in Company’s Hands

February 14, 2026 318 Views 0 comment Print

The ITAT reaffirmed that Section 2(22)(e) cannot extend the definition of shareholder to a concern receiving the loan. The deemed dividend, if attracted, must be taxed in the hands of the substantial shareholder alone.

Reopening U/s 147 quashed – Borrowed satisfaction mechanical approval U/s 151 invalid; sale of investments cannot be taxed U/s 68 – ITAT Kolkata

February 14, 2026 300 Views 0 comment Print

The Tribunal held that reopening based solely on investigation wing information without independent application of mind is invalid. Mechanical reasons cannot justify reassessment under Section 147.

ITAT Kolkata – ₹6.99 Cr Share Capital Addition u/s 68 Deleted; Identity & Genuineness Proved

February 14, 2026 459 Views 0 comment Print

The Tribunal found that the investors had substantial net worth far exceeding their investments. With PAN, ITRs, bank statements, and audited financials on record, the share capital could not be treated as unexplained.

Unexplained investment addition of ₹12.30 Cr deleted – Funds for software project proved; Rule 46A objection rejected – ITAT Delhi

February 14, 2026 615 Views 0 comment Print

The Tribunal confirmed that once identity, source, and movement of funds are established through records, treating the investment as unexplained is unjustified. Revenues appeal was dismissed.

Section 56(2)(viia) Addition Upheld – Shares Allotted Below FMV Taxable: ITAT Kolkata

February 14, 2026 486 Views 0 comment Print

The ITAT held that fresh allotment of shares at a value below fair market value attracts Section 56(2)(viia). The term receives includes allotment, and the differential amount was rightly taxed as income from other sources.

Assessment Quashed – Invalid Notice u/s 143(2) by Non-Jurisdictional AO: ITAT Kolkata

February 14, 2026 498 Views 0 comment Print

The ITAT held that absence of a valid notice under Section 143(2) is a jurisdictional defect. Since the notice was not properly issued by the competent officer, the entire assessment was declared void ab initio.

Section 68 Addition Deleted – Source of Source Not Required for AY 2014-15: ITAT Delhi

February 14, 2026 591 Views 0 comment Print

The Tribunal ruled that proving source of source was not mandatory for AY 2014-15. Since identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness were established, unsecured loan additions were deleted.

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031