Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pardaman Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pardaman Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) Reassessment Quashed for Jurisdictional Defect: Section 148 Notice Issued by Wrong Authority The Chandigarh Bench of the ITAT quashed the reassessment proceedings for AY 2018-19 on the ground of lack of jurisdiction. The Tribunal held that the notice issued under section 148 was invalid as it was issued by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer instead of through the faceless mechanism mandated by the Ministry of Finance Notification dated 29.03.2022. The assessee challenged the reassessment at the threshold, contending that after the said notification, al...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SCN u/s 74 GST Valid even if based on Material from allegedly Illegal Search or from another Commissionerate-Karnataka HC Sec 13(1)(c) Not Attracted for Higher Profit to Related Concerns: HC Karnataka HC Quashes TDS Refund on Land Acquisition Over Suppression; ₹5L Cost Assessment Order Passed in Name of Deceased Assessee Held Void – Karnataka HC LTCG Cannot Be Taxed in Wife’s Hands When Property Settled by Husband – ITAT Deletes Rs. 19.86 Cr Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031