Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pardaman Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pardaman Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) Reassessment Quashed for Jurisdictional Defect: Section 148 Notice Issued by Wrong Authority The Chandigarh Bench of the ITAT quashed the reassessment proceedings for AY 2018-19 on the ground of lack of jurisdiction. The Tribunal held that the notice issued under section 148 was invalid as it was issued by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer instead of through the faceless mechanism mandated by the Ministry of Finance Notification dated 29.03.2022. The assessee challenged the reassessment at the threshold, contending that after the said notification, al...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 68 Additions Fail: Documentary Evidence Cannot Be Ignored Without Enquiry Commission Disallowance Remanded – 133(6) Non-Response Not Sufficient; Ad-hoc Expenses Cut to 10% Stamp Duty vs Actual Value Dispute: ITAT Orders DVO Valuation ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Penalty U/s 272A(1)(d) Deleted: Reasonable Cause Subsequent Compliance Accepted View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930