Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pardaman Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pardaman Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) Reassessment Quashed for Jurisdictional Defect: Section 148 Notice Issued by Wrong Authority The Chandigarh Bench of the ITAT quashed the reassessment proceedings for AY 2018-19 on the ground of lack of jurisdiction. The Tribunal held that the notice issued under section 148 was invalid as it was issued by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer instead of through the faceless mechanism mandated by the Ministry of Finance Notification dated 29.03.2022. The assessee challenged the reassessment at the threshold, contending that after the said notification, al...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930