Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Usha Bansal Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Usha Bansal Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) Reassessment Quashed for AY 2019-20: Section 148A(d) Order Passed by Jurisdictional AO Held Without Authority The Chandigarh Bench (SMC) of the ITAT quashed the reassessment proceedings for AY 2019-20 after accepting an additional legal ground raised by the assessee. The Tribunal held that the order passed under section 148A(d) on 31.03.2023 was invalid since it was issued by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer instead of the Faceless Assessing Officer, as mandatorily required under the CBDT Notification dated 29.03.2022. The Tribunal permitted the assesse...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Occupancy Certificate Not Starting Point for Indexation: Bangalore ITAT Allows Benefit From Actual Use Date Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition Over Lack of Inquiry & Cross-Examination 10-Year Silence & Uncancelled GPA: SC Upholds Sale Against Fraud Claims Section 271D Penalty Cannot Survive After Reassessment Itself is Quashed: Mumbai ITAT Unsigned Affidavit Can’t End Appeal: ITAT Directs CIT(A) to Allow Defect Correction View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031