Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shueb Urf Mohd. Kunwer Shueb Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Shueb Urf Mohd. Kunwer Shueb Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) 147 Is Not a Fishing Net – If You Don’t Catch the Fish, You Can’t Keep the Boat- No Addition on Issue of Reopening? Whole Assessment Goes in Trash In this case, the reassessment was initiated u/s 148/147 solely on the ground that Assessee had allegedly made cash deposits of ₹26,06,500, & therefore income had escaped assessment. However, during the reassessment, AO did NOT make any addition whatsoever on this “reason recorded” issue. Instead, he went on to make other additions relating to Section 54F deduction, cost of acquisition...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Mass Relief on 234E Fees: ITAT Deletes Levy for Pre-01.06.2015 Period DVO Valuation Without Notice Invalid: Matter Remanded for Fresh Determination Section 56(2)(x): Stamp Value on Booking Date to Apply – ITAT Deletes Addition Past Savings Accepted: Small Cash Introduction Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Reassessment for AY 2015-16 Time-Barred – ITAT Quashes Entire Penny Stock Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930