Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Tejas Ghanshyambhai Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Tejas Ghanshyambhai Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Assessee, a proprietor who sold an immovable property as co-owner & received ₹1.8 Cr (30% share), claimed deduction u/s 54EC (₹50L) & u/s 54F (₹36.27L). The return was filed belatedly (24-03-2017) & revised belatedly. AO denied both deductions & added ₹86.27L, thereafter levied penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars. In quantum appeal, CIT(A) accepted that the investments were mostly within the allowed timeline (till 31-07-2016) & directed AO to proportionately allow deduction u/s 54EC/54F. Thus,...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930