Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ramakrishna Murali Vs ITO Ward-6(3)(1) (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-2013
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ramakrishna Murali Vs ITO Ward-6(3)(1) (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT Bangalore held that penalty u/s 271D of the Income Tax Act is leviable on loan taken by way of cash. Notably, repayment of cash loan by way of cheque wouldn’t exonerate the assessee from levy of penalty. Facts- The assessee is an individual engaged in the business of wholesale trading in wines, liquor and other related products as a proprietor and under the name & style of M/s. Nanjundeshwara Wines. During assessment proceedings, it was noticed by the AO that assessee has taken unsecured loan by way of cash at Rs.1,64,70,000/- ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031