This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT directs CIT(A) to admit additional evidences
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Sanjay Matai Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2008-09
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Jaipur
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Sanjay Matai Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
From perusal of record, we observed that Section 254 of the Act read with Rule 29 of the Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963 states about power to admit additional evidences, whether mere fact that evidence sought to be produced is vital and important does not provide a substantial cause to allow its admission at appellate stage, especially when evidence was available to party at initial state and had not been produced at that time. Rule 46A of the Rules speaks about production of additional evidence before the [Deputy Commissioner (Ap...





