Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

ITAT directs CIT(A) to admit additional evidences

Case Law Details

Case Name
Sanjay Matai Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2008-09
Advertisement Sanjay Matai Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) From perusal of record, we observed that Section 254 of the Act read with Rule 29 of the Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963 states about power to admit additional evidences, whether mere fact that evidence sought to be produced is vital and important does not provide a substantial cause to allow its admission at appellate stage, especially when evidence was available to party at initial state and had not been produced at that time. Rule 46A of the Rules speaks about production of additional evidence before the [Deputy Commissioner (Ap...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

Mahendra Gargieya
Qualification: LL.B / Advocate
Company: Mahendra Gargieya & Associates
Location: Jaipur, Rajasthan
Articles Published: 49

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *