ITAT directs CIT(A) to admit additional evidences

Sanjay Matai Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)

From perusal of record, we observed that Section 254 of the Act read with Rule 29 of the Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963 states about power to admit additional evidences, whether mere fact that evidence sought to be produced is vital and important does not provide a substantial cause to allow its admission at appellate stage, especially when evidence was available to party at initial state and had not been produced at that time. Rule 46A of the Rules speaks about production of ad

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.