This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
S. 69C Bogus Purchases: Right of cross-examination is not absolute
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Soman Sun Citi Vs JT. CIT (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2011-12
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Soman Sun Citi Vs. JCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
The assessee is aggrieved that the statements/affidavits of these alleged hawala dealers which were recorded at the back of the assessee were utilised by Revenue to cause prejudice to the assessee without confronting the assessee with the copies of the said statements/affidavits , and also cross examination of these alleged bogus dealers were not allowed to the assessee by Revenue. The right of cross examination is not absolute. If we eschew the statement/affidavit of hawala dealers from record, the primary onus which lay on the assessee ...





