This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No Service of 143(1) Intimation = No Delay in Appeal – ITAT Revives TDS Credit Claim After 15 Years
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Executors of Shri Ramanlal Jagjivan Gokal Vs Additional/ DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2009-10
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Executors of Shri Ramanlal Jagjivan Gokal Vs Additional/DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
The Mumbai ITAT held that where an assessee was never served with the intimation under section 143(1), the limitation period for filing appeal cannot start merely from the date of processing of return. The Tribunal observed that the assessee became aware of the outstanding demand only after receipt of a section 245 adjustment order proposing set-off of refund against old tax demand.
The assessee discovered that while processing the return for AY 2009-10, the department had granted TDS credit of only ₹...




