Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ashish Shashikant Choksi Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ashish Shashikant Choksi Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) No Seized Material, No 153A Addition- Search Yielded Nothing Against Assessees: Entire ₹1.34 Cr Penny-Stock Addition Quashed These seven connected appeals arose from assessments framed u/s 153A after a search on 24.08.2018 in the Platinum Group, covering residential premises of the Assessees. All cases involved a common addition: treating entire sale consideration from sale of shares of PMC Fincorp Ltd (formerly Priti Mercantile Ltd) as unexplained credit u/s 68, based on DGIT (Inv) Lucknow reports, SEBI’s 26.02.2021 order & the statement ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031