Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Narayanan Varalakshmi Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Narayanan Varalakshmi Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) 148 Notice Issued by JAO After 29-03-2022 Held Invalid—Faceless Reassessment Mandatory; Entire 147 Proceedings Quashed  Assessee, who runs a small bus-transport service and had not filed return for AY 2018-19 as her income was below the taxable limit, received information regarding cash deposits of ₹92,28,000, time deposits of ₹10,12,572 and bank interest of ₹72,193. Based on this, the ITO, Non-Corp Ward 1(3), Madurai, issued notice u/s 148 on 30-03-2022 and passed an order u/s 148A(d) on 28-03-2022. The Assessment Unit, NFAC completed reas...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031