Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sudesh Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sudesh Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) Demonetisation Cash Deposit Addition Deleted- Chandigarh ITAT Accepts Cash Sales & Stock Position Chandigarh Tribunal examined the validity of an addition of Rs. 63,41,000/- made u/s 68 with tax charged u/s 115BBE. Assessee, engaged in wholesale & retail trading of sugar, edible oil & foodgrains, had deposited Rs. 68,35,000/- during the demonetisation period. AO treated the deposits as unexplained cash, granting credit of only Rs. 4,60,000/- as cash sales, and added the balance. CIT(A) sustained the addition. Tribunal noted that the authorities ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031