The Telangana High Court permitted the taxpayer to seek revocation of GST registration cancellation after returns were not filed due to closure of business. The Court granted liberty to file a fresh application as the petitioner intended to restart operations.
The Telangana High Court directed GST authorities to decide pending cancellation proceedings within two weeks after noting that the taxpayer’s business operations had come to a standstill.
ROC Patna penalized a company and its managing director for failure to file financial statements under Section 137(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. The order highlights that prolonged filing defaults can attract maximum statutory penalties.
The ROC imposed the maximum statutory penalty on a Nidhi company for non-filing of financial statements under Section 137(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. The Managing Director was also penalized separately for continuing default.
The article explains how courts use the Gillette Defence to reject patent infringement claims when the accused product or process already existed as prior art. It highlights major rulings from India, the UK, Canada, and Europe that reinforce the principle that public knowledge cannot be monopolized.
ROC Patna imposed penalties on a Nidhi company and its Managing Director for failure to file financial statements under Section 137 of the Companies Act, 2013. The balance sheet remained unfiled despite adjudication notice and hearing opportunity.
The ROC penalized a Nidhi company and its Managing Director for non-filing of financial statements under Section 137(3) of the Companies Act, 2013.
The adjudication order explains how failure to file the FY 2022-23 balance sheet resulted in penalties on both the company and its managing director. The ruling emphasizes strict compliance obligations for annual financial statement filings.
The ROC imposed penalties on a Nidhi company and its Managing Director for non-filing of financial statements under Section 137(3) of the Companies Act, 2013.
ROC Patna penalized a company and its managing director for failing to file financial statements for FY 2016-17 under Section 137(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. The order highlights that continuous non-compliance can attract maximum statutory penalties.
