Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Deduction U/s. 54F allowable even if construction is not complete if Assessee invests the amount within stipulated time

Case Law Details

Case Name
Narasimha Raju Rudra Raju Vs Asst. Commissioner of Income‑ tax (ITAT Hyderabad)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2008- 09
Advertisement Provision contained u/s 54F being a beneficial provision has to be construed liberally. In various judicial precedents as also in the decision cited before us by the learned AR, it has been held that the condition precedent for claiming benefit u/s 54F is the capital gain realized from the sale of capital asset should have been parted by the assessee and invested either in purchasing a residential house or in constructing a residential house. If the assessee has invested the money in construction of residential house merely because the construction was not complete in all resp...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *