This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Deduction U/s. 54F allowable even if construction is not complete if Assessee invests the amount within stipulated time
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Narasimha Raju Rudra Raju Vs Asst. Commissioner of Income‑ tax (ITAT Hyderabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2008- 09
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Hyderabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Provision contained u/s 54F being a beneficial provision has to be construed liberally.
In various judicial precedents as also in the decision cited before us by the learned AR, it has been held that the condition precedent for claiming benefit u/s 54F is the capital gain realized from the sale of capital asset should have been parted by the assessee and invested either in purchasing a residential house or in constructing a residential house.
If the assessee has invested the money in construction of residential house merely because the construction was not complete in all resp...





