Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Narasimha Raju Rudra Raju Vs Asst. Commissioner of Income‑ tax (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2008- 09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Provision contained u/s 54F being a beneficial provision has to be construed liberally.

In various judicial precedents as also in the decision cited before us by the learned AR, it has been held that the condition precedent for claiming benefit u/s 54F is the capital gain realized from the sale of capital asset should have been parted by the assessee and invested either in purchasing a residential house or in constructing a residential house.

If the assessee has invested the money in constru

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31