Case Law Details
Case Name : Narasimha Raju Rudra Raju Vs Asst. Commissioner of Income‑ tax (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2008- 09
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Hyderabad
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Provision contained u/s 54F being a beneficial provision has to be construed liberally.
In various judicial precedents as also in the decision cited before us by the learned AR, it has been held that the condition precedent for claiming benefit u/s 54F is the capital gain realized from the sale of capital asset should have been parted by the assessee and invested either in purchasing a residential house or in constructing a residential house.
If the assessee has invested the money in constru
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.