The ROC imposed significant penalties on the company and its directors for failing to file financial statements. The ruling reinforces strict consequences for prolonged non-compliance under Section 137(3).
The ROC Delhi penalized a company director for filing e-form AOC-4 with wrong attachments, highlighting the importance of compliance with Companies Act provisions and proper documentation.
The ruling found that bids were rejected on factors unrelated to Section 29A and absent from the process document. The takeaway is that liquidation sales must follow transparent, predefined conditions.
A company and its directors avoided penalties for late filing of financial statements after submitting them within thirty days of the show-cause notice, demonstrating compliance relief under Section 454(3).
A company and its directors were exempted from penalties for late filing of financial statements after rectifying the default within thirty days, highlighting the protective provision under Section 454(3).
A company and its director were penalised for failing to mention directors’ DINs in financial statements, highlighting the importance of accurate statutory disclosures under Section 158.
A company and its directors were penalised under the Companies Act for failing to hold a quarterly board meeting within the prescribed 120-day period, highlighting strict enforcement of Section 173 compliance.
MCA penalizes a company and its Managing Director for late filing of director resignation form DIR-12, emphasizing strict compliance under Section 172 of the Companies Act.
The ROC penalized the company and its directors for not filing financial statements for FY 2021-22. The order stresses that non-compliance under Section 137 attracts maximum monetary penalties.
Appeal challenging non-disclosure of pay, allowances, and travel guidelines was dismissed, as the information was already accessible online and exempt under the RTI Act.
