Follow Us:

Notifications/Circulars

SEBI : Submission of B/S & details of utilisation of funds, etc.

September 23, 1994 577 Views 0 comment Print

We understand that in the event of our failure to submit the above documents or withdrawal of Acknowledgement Card by SEBI, we shall forfeit the right of listing of the securities and shall be liable to refund the subscription money to the investors immediately.

Circular No. 61/61/94-Central Excise, Dated: 19.09.1994

September 19, 1994 481 Views 0 comment Print

Circular No. 61/61/94-CX I am directed to enclose certain targets set out by the Board in respect of above captioned subject (Annexure-I) for the year 1994-95 and to request you to send quarterly report on the subject in the enclosed proforma (Annexure-II) to the Board by the 5th of the month following every quarter of the year. Report for the 1st and 2nd quarter should be furnished by Ist week of October 1994.

Central Excise-Classification of Prickly Heat Powder whether under Chapter 30 or 33 – Clarification regarding

September 19, 1994 1186 Views 0 comment Print

Circular No. 59/59/94-CX I am directed to invite your kind attention to the instructions contained in Board”s Circular No. 1/93-CX.3 dated 17.3.1993 whereby classification of prickly heat powder manufactured under the brand names of “Nycil”, “Shower to Shower” and “Johnsons”

Circular No. 58/58/94-Central Excise, Dated: 19.09.1994

September 19, 1994 616 Views 0 comment Print

Circular No. 58/58/94-CX Kind attention is invited to the 69th Report of the Public Accounts Committee (1993-94) (10th Lok Sabha) dealing with action taken by the Government on the recommendations / observations of the Committee contained in their 44th Report (10th Lok Sabha) on “Union Excise Duties-Non-levy/Short levy of duty due to incorrect grant of exemption-Motor Vehicles.”

Stainless circles are clarified under 72.19 or 72.22

September 14, 1994 631 Views 0 comment Print

Circular No. 57/57/94-CX This corrigendum seeks to correct certain clerical mistake in Notification No.106/94-CE dated the 4th May, 1994.

Circular No. 56/56/94-Central Excise, Dated: 14.09.1994

September 14, 1994 751 Views 0 comment Print

Circular No. 56/56/94-CX I am directed to invite your attention to Board”s Circular No. 50/88-CX-8 dated 20.8.88 (F.No.267/31/88-CX-8) wherein it was clarified in consultation with Ministry of Law that if the raw materials are supplied by a principal manufacturer for the manufacture of any goods on job work basis, then the same would not be entitled for SSI exemption (unless principal manufacturer himself is entitled for SSI exemption) even if job worker is otherwise entitled for SSI exemption

Compounded levy on stainless steel pattis/pattas – Details about workers employed not to be given in form for compounded levy

September 12, 1994 517 Views 0 comment Print

Circular No. 55/55/94-CX I am directed to forward herewith copy of notification No.37/94-Central Excises (NT) dated 2nd September , 1994. This notification seeks to prescribe the specimen forms etc. to be used by units opting for compounded levy scheme on stainless steel pattis and pattas introduced vide notification No.22/94-Central Excises (NT) dated the 13th may, 1994.

Recommendation of Rekhi Committee assessment of monthly RT-12 Returns-Reg

September 6, 1994 3595 Views 0 comment Print

Circular No. 54/54/94-CX I am directed to say that one of the points recommended by the Rekhi Committee is that while assessing the monthly RT-12 Return, The Superintendent of Central Excise should be bound to follow the approved classification list. The “inquiry” to be made by him as envisaged in Rule 1731 does not extend to a review of the approved classification list.

Circular No. 691-Income tax dated 5-9-1994

September 5, 1994 552 Views 0 comment Print

Circular No. 691-Income tax NoCircular . 341, dated 10-5-1982 (Annex) had been issued in the, wake of the Supreme Court’s judgment in the case of Cloth Traders (P.) Ltd [1979] 118 ITR 243/1 Taxman 335. This decision was subsequently overruled by the Supreme Court in the case ofDistributors (Baroda) (P.) Ltd v. Union of India [1985] 155 ITR 120/22 Taxman 49 which therefore gives the correct legal position

Rule 56-B-Instructions regarding

September 5, 1994 511 Views 0 comment Print

Circular No.53/53/94-CX I am directed to invite your attention to Board”s Circular No. 14/88-CX.6 (F.No.212/30/87-CX.6) dated 2nd March, 1994 on the above subject wherein it was stated inter alia, that the powers of granting permission under Rule 56-B would vest in the Collectors only.

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930