In exercise of powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), read with rules 18 and 20 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995, the Central Government hereby rescinds the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No.97/96-Customs, dated the 20th day of December, 1996.
Therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 9A of the said Customs Tariff Act, read with sub-sections (5) and (6) of the said section 9A and rule 23 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995.
I am directed to invite your attention to the above mentioned subject. It has been brought to the notice of the Board that the existing arrangements require certain modifications so as to facilitate the work relating to EOUs
Notification No. 11469-Income Tax In the notification of the Government of India, in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) (Foreign Tax Division), number S.O. 650 (E), dated the 10th July, 2000, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, sub-section (ii), dated the 10th July, 2000 [published at (2000) 161 CTR (St) 63]
It is directed to refer to the subject mentioned above and to state that the matter regarding classification of CD-Writer was discussed in the Conference of Commissioners of Customs on Tariff and Allied matters held at Chennai on 21st and 22nd Jan., 2000. As contrary views were expressed regarding classification, the Conference consultation that the matter would be examined by the Board in
It is directed to refer to the Boards Circular No. 53/99-Customs, dated the 24th August, 1999 on above-mentioned subject. The said Circular was issued to enforce the licensing requirements of the Sections 406/407 of the Marine Shipping Act, 1958 for foreign flag vessels which call at Indian Ports. It has been pointed out by the Directorate general of Shipping, Ministry of Surface Transport that in
(5) A manufacturer of machinery falling under heading Nos. 84.26, 84.27, 84.28, 84.29 and 84.30 and motor vehicles, who had received, on or after the 1st day of March, 2000, tyres, tubes and flaps falling under sub-heading Nos. 4011.90, 4012.11, 4012.19, 4012.90 and 4013.90 cleared before the 1st day of March, 2000 on which special excise duty has been paid as it existed prior to the 1st day of March, 2000
(a) in clause (4), – 1. in item (xxv), for the word and figure “Cochin-I”, the word Cochin shall be substituted; 2. in item (xxvi), for the word and figures “Cochin-II”, the word Calicut shall be substituted.
F. No. 345/2/2000-TRU A point has been raised that the CENVAT credit should be allowed in the event of additional demand of duty that may be confirmed against the manufacturer of inputs or capital goods. It has also been mentioned that in certain cases provisional assessment is resorted to on account of price escalation clause by way of an agreement between the buyer and the seller.
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), the Central Government, hereby makes the following further amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 18/2000-Customs, dated the 1st March, 2000.
