In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Board of Excise and Customs hereby appoints the Commissioner of Customs, Inland Container Depot, Tughlakabad, New Delhi to be the Commissioner of Customs(Port), Kolkata, Commissioner of Customs, Kandla, or, as the case may be, Commissioner of Customs (Imports), Mumbai for the purpose of adjudicating the show cause notice No.50D/25/98-CI, dated 11th February, 2002 issued by the Additional Director General, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, New Delhi to the below mentioned parties, namely.
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Board of Excise and Customs hereby appoints the Commissioner of Customs, Pune to be the Commissioner of Customs, Goa for the purpose of adjudicating the Show Cause cum Demand Notices pertaining to M/s. Ayesha Exports, D/5-5, Model Town -III, New Delhi – 110 009 and M/s. Kazal Impex, Delhi – 110 009, issued vide F.No.DRI/BZU/C/34/2001, dated the 12th November, 2001 by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Mumbai Zonal Unit.
Circular No. 649/40/2002-CX I am directed to state that representations have been received from the trade and industry seeking clarification on the computation of the exemption limit available to a textile processor undertaking stentering of cotton fabrics with the aid of an open-air stenter and the definition of an open-air stenter. The matter has been examined carefully and the clarification is as given below.
Circular No. 648/39/2002-CX I am directed to refer to Part III of Chapter 7 of Central Excise Manual issued in September 2001relating to Simplified Export Procedure for exempted units and to say that representations from small scale manufacturers have been received by Board with a request to accept Sales Tax documents as proof of export for the supplies made to other domestic manufacturers who use the said goods in manufacture/packing of goods for export
In exercise of powers conferred by sub-section (2) of section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), read with rules 13 and 20 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995, the Central Government hereby rescinds the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 105/2001-Customs, dated the 10th October, 2001 [G.S.R. 769 (E), dated the 10th October, 2001], except as respects things done or omitted to be done before such rescission.
(a) Acrylic Yarn had been exported to India from Nepal below its normal value; (b) the Indian industry had suffered material injury and was being threatened with further injury; (c) the injury had been caused by the dumped imports from Nepal
AND WHEREAS on the basis of the aforesaid findings of the designated authority, the Central Government had imposed an anti-dumping duty on the said thermal sensitive paper vide notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 127/2001-Customs, dated the 21st December, 2001, [G.S.R. 915 (E), dated the 21st December, 2001]
The principal notification No.21/2002 – Customs dated the 1st March ,2002 -was published in the Gazette of India, (Extraordinary ) vide GSR No.118(E) , dated , the 1st March, 2002 and last amended by notification No.70/2002- Customs dated, the 11th July, 2002 published in the Gazette of India (Extraordinary) vide GSR No. 490 (E) dated the 11th July, 2002.
I am directed to refer to Board’s Circular No. 40/2002-Cus., dated 17/7/2002 on the above-mentioned subject, wherein various issues involved in finalisation of provisional assessment
It has now been decided to revise and simplify the format of New Scheme Report. A copy of the revised format is enclosed. In accordance with Regulations 58(1) and 77 of SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996, all mutual funds are advised to henceforth submit the new scheme reports to SEBI,
