RBI released draft PPI Directions, 2026 to enhance security, governance, and operational clarity. The key takeaway is stricter compliance norms and improved customer protection in prepaid instruments.
The case examines the MPC’s response to geopolitical tensions and supply shocks. The Committee held rates steady, citing uncertainty and the need for a cautious, data-driven approach.
The issue was whether an insolvency professional fulfilled due diligence obligations under Section 29A. The Committee held that failure to verify and disclose disqualification of a wilful defaulter invalidated the process. It emphasized that eligibility must be continuously assessed and cannot be ignored at later stages.
The issue was regulatory overlap after asset management services were restricted. The Authority removed a conflicting provision, ensuring compliance and clarity in ship leasing operations.
The issue was the lack of a unified process for rights issues in IFSCs. The Authority introduced a detailed framework mandating disclosures, timelines, and compliance standards.
The case examined whether Section 42 was violated in a private placement. The authority ruled there was no substantive breach and replaced the penalty with a nominal fine for a procedural lapse.
The case addressed delayed filing of return of allotment under Section 42(9). The authority reduced the penalty after recognizing a government circular that excluded part of the delay period.
The authority found non-compliance with Section 42(6) due to absence of a separate bank account. It held that such violation attracts penalty under Section 42(10).
Omission of required attachments in annual return filing resulted in penalties under Section 450. The decision stresses the importance of accurate and complete filings.
Failure to attach share transfer details in the annual return resulted in penalties under the residuary provision. The ruling highlights that even minor filing omissions can trigger statutory penalties.
