Madras High Court held that granting third hearing mandatory when petitioner has specifically sought for the same. Order set aside and matter remanded back since third hearing not granted.
Bombay High Court upheld compensation over reinstatement for a casual labour terminated without due process, emphasizing evolving judicial trends in labour cases.
During the relevant period, the petitioner filed its return and paid the appropriate taxes. While scrutinizing the petitioner’s monthly return, it was noticed that there was mismatch between GSTR-01 and GSTR-3B/GSTR-2A/2B.
Allahabad High Court permits release of goods under UPGST Act 2017, subject to security, while allowing petitioner to appeal penalty.
As CIT(E) noticed some inconsistencies in the details submitted by the assessee, a show-cause notice was issued to the assessee why the application in Form 10AB should not be rejected.
Supreme Court in Singrauli Super Thermal Power Station case stresses the need for natural justice and disclosure of expert reports in NGT proceedings.
Supreme Court’s judgment in Madhyamam Broadcasting v. Union of India emphasizes procedural fairness under Articles 14, 19, and 21 as core to natural justice principles.
Delhi HC rules against negative blocking of Electronic Credit Ledger (ECL) under Rule 86A, stating it exceeds the scope of ITC provisions. Relief granted to petitioner.
The ITAT Jaipur ruling in the case of Alok Vijawat vs. PCIT discusses the invocation of Section 263 for the 2019-20 assessment and challenges raised against it.
ITAT Ahmedabad imposed cost of Rs. 10,000 on the assessee due to non-compliance with the show cause notice and directed to restore the matter back to the file of Jurisdictional Assessing Officer.
