ITAT Ahmedabad imposed cost of Rs. 5,000 for non-compliance before CIT(A) and held that the assessee can’t simply escape by placing the blame on the Tax Consultant. Thus, matter restored back to the file of AO.
Tamil Nadu Grama Bank challenges EPF assessment order in Madras HC, claiming exemption based on its own pension scheme under the Employees’ Provident Funds Act.
“Analysis of Vijay Singh Jakhar vs ESIC case, addressing liability under ESI Act for non-payment of contributions and the definition of ‘principal employer.'”
“Bombay High Court quashes FIR against Pidilite manager citing double jeopardy. Incident involved factory fire causing injuries. Read key legal arguments and judgment.”
Telangana High Court’s ruling in the Syndicate Bank case clarifies the priority of provident fund contributions over other debts.
ITAT Delhi held that dismissal of appeal by CIT(A) for non-prosecution and confirmed the order of the AO as no submissions were made on behalf of the assessee. Accordingly, matter restored to CIT(A).
Bombay High Court ruled in favor of employee’s deemed voluntary retirement after the bank’s failure to communicate rejection within three months.
Punjab and Haryana HC dismisses petition against Labour Court’s decision on worker’s termination, applying res judicata principles and upholding previous ruling.
The assessment order was framed in which the AO made certain additions in the hands of the assessee under Section 69A of the Act r.w.s. 115BBE of the Act amounting to Rs. 2,05,00,477/- as unexplained income of the assessee.
ITAT Delhi remands case due to notice sent to wrong email & lack of portal knowledge. Assessing officer directed to reconsider with new evidence.
