The ITAT Delhi deleted a demonetisation-related cash deposit addition for a jeweller, ruling that Section 68 doesn’t apply to recorded sales and that a profit cannot be taxed twice.
ITAT Delhi deleted penalties against Sahara India Commercial, citing a defective “omnibus” notice and a time-barred, invalid reassessment based on “borrowed satisfaction.”
ITAT Delhi held the reopening of an assessment invalid for Viramgam Mahesana Project Limited, ruling against borrowed satisfaction and a “change of opinion” by the Assessing Officer.
Mere initiation of reassessment proceedings, which remain unfinalized, could not be a ground to deny an assessee the benefits available under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas (DTVSV) Scheme, 2024.
Addition of cash withdrawal under Section 69C in relation to the legitimate gold loan intermediary business was not justified observing that the documentary evidence including gold loan recorded validated gold loan business, thus there was no unexplained nature in the withdrawal.
Anybody carrying on the business of Digital Marketing with cash transactions both on the aspect of receipts and payments in cash below 5% of the turnover, which was below Rs.5 Crores as per the proviso to Section 44 AB (a), the said assessee was not required to file an audit report and they were exempted.
ITAT Visakhapatnam ruled a temple trust cannot claim Section 12A exemption for years prior to its registration, unless assessment proceedings were already pending.
The ITAT Chandigarh directed the grant of a 12AA registration to a temple trust under state control, emphasizing that a trust deed is not essential when the state governs its administration.
ITAT Visakhapatnam ruled a temple trust without 12A registration cannot claim capital expenditure as a deduction, upholding a revisional order under Section 263.
An ITAT Hyderabad ruling clarifies that Section 10(23BBA) of the Income Tax Act exempts government-appointed administrative bodies, not the temples themselves, from tax.
