Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kulbhushan Sahtani Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kulbhushan Sahtani Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Section 68 can’t apply to recorded sales- No Double Taxation on cash sales – Books Audited, Stock Tallied – ITAT deletes Demonetisation cash deposit addition Delhi ITAT deleted an addition of ₹43.50 lakh made on account of cash deposits during the demonetisation period, holding that where cash sales are duly recorded in audited books & supported by stock records, the same cannot be treated as unexplained cash credits under section 68. Assessee , proprietor engaged in jewellery trading, had filed his return declaring income of ₹9.26 lakh....
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Hyderabad: AO Cannot Exceed Limited Scrutiny Scope – Entire Assessment Held Invalid Bank Deposits Treated as Business Turnover – ITAT Reduces Profit Rate from 10% to 2% No Double Taxation of Benami Property – Protective Addition Deleted by ITAT U/s 80P Deduction Denied for Belated Return Post-2018 Amendment – ITAT Hyderabad Upholds Disallowance ITAT Hyderabad: Foreign Tax Relief Must Be Deducted While Computing Interest U/s 234A/B/C View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930