Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sampath Vinayagar Temple Trust Vs CIT (Exemptions) (ITAT Visakhapatnam)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sampath Vinayagar Temple Trust Vs CIT (Exemptions) (ITAT Visakhapatnam) No Section 12A Registration, No  Capital Expenditure allowed: ITAT Visakhapatnam; Without 12A Registration, Temple Trust Loses 263 Battle on Capital expenditure Claims Assessee, not registered u/s 12A, claimed exemption u/s 11 in returns. AO completed assessments treating it as an AOP, denying exemption but allowing the entire payments as revenue expenditure without verifying their nature. CIT(E), in revision, noted that large portions of payments (₹75.83 lakh in AY 2011-12) were capital in nature &  not allowable ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930