Case Law Details
Case Name : Sampath Vinayagar Temple Trust Vs CIT (Exemptions) (ITAT Visakhapatnam)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Visakhapatnam
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sampath Vinayagar Temple Trust Vs CIT (Exemptions) (ITAT Visakhapatnam)
No Section 12A Registration, No Capital Expenditure allowed: ITAT Visakhapatnam; Without 12A Registration, Temple Trust Loses 263 Battle on Capital expenditure Claims
Assessee, not registered u/s 12A, claimed exemption u/s 11 in returns. AO completed assessments treating it as an AOP, denying exemption but allowing the entire payments as revenue expenditure without verifying their nature.
CIT(E), in revision, noted that large portions of payments (₹75.83 lakh in AY 2011-12) were capital in nature & not allowable ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


