Delhi ITAT deletes over ₹6 crore in additions, ruling that documents impounded from a property broker related to third-party transactions, not his own income.
Delhi ITAT rules that assessments against a non-searched person must be conducted under Section 153C, not 143(3), when a satisfaction note is recorded. Invalid jurisdiction nullifies the assessment.
Mumbai ITAT rules cash withdrawn before demonetization is not unexplained, deleting a ₹23 lakh addition. The tribunal partly upheld the disallowance of agricultural income.
ITAT Delhi restores Sarita Jain’s reassessment for a new hearing, citing improper service of notices to an incorrect email ID and a violation of natural justice.
ITAT Delhi dismissed a Revenue appeal and upheld CIT(A)’s decision to tax a vegetable vendor’s cash deposits at a 2% net profit rate, rejecting full amount as unexplained income.
Jai Prakash Virmani Vs DCIT/ACIT (ITAT Delhi) ITAT Delhi Holds Additional Income Applied Towards House Construction Cannot be Taxed Again as Unexplained Investment – Section 69 & 115BBE Not Applicable A survey u/s 133A was conducted at Assessee’s business premises on 23.01.2019. Loose papers indicating cash withdrawals & expenditure on construction of house were impounded. […]
Delhi ITAT quashes ₹11 crore in tax additions, ruling that additions in a search case cannot be made without finding incriminating material on the assessee’s premises.
ITAT Delhi has directed Assessing Officer to amend assessment for Richemont India, reducing a Rs 33.95 crore transfer pricing addition to nil.
ITAT Delhi: Addition on expensive watches deleted. The court held they belonged to the entire Kochar family, and possession was consistent with their status.
Assessee had recorded the cash deposits as sales in the audited books of account, and no discrepancies were found by AO or CIT(A). Failure to provide PAN alone could not be the sole reason to treat the sales as unexplained money, particularly when Aadhaar details were submitted.
