Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sarita Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sarita Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) ITAT Delhi Restores Reassessment for Fresh Consideration – Non-Service of Notice on Correct Email Leads to Remand Assessee challenged reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 148 as time-barred. The reassessment had been completed u/s 147 r.w.s 144 r.w.s 144B on 20.05.2023, wherein Assessee was not represented. Similarly, the order of CIT(A) dated 29.08.2024 was also ex parte due to non-appearance. Before Tribunal, it was argued that Assessee did not respond because notices were sent to an incorrect email ID as reflected in IT portal, instead of the email addres...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031