Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sarita Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sarita Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) ITAT Delhi Restores Reassessment for Fresh Consideration – Non-Service of Notice on Correct Email Leads to Remand Assessee challenged reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 148 as time-barred. The reassessment had been completed u/s 147 r.w.s 144 r.w.s 144B on 20.05.2023, wherein Assessee was not represented. Similarly, the order of CIT(A) dated 29.08.2024 was also ex parte due to non-appearance. Before Tribunal, it was argued that Assessee did not respond because notices were sent to an incorrect email ID as reflected in IT portal, instead of the email addres...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930