Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Jatin Madani (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Jatin Madani (ITAT Delhi) Post-Search Statements is not Incriminating Material-153C Route Ignored, 153A Fails – No Incriminating Material, No Addition-Third-Party Statements Not Enough Revenue appealed against CIT(A)’s order deleting additions aggregating over ₹11 crore made in assessment u/s 153A r.w.s. 143(3) pursuant to search in Ashish Begwani group. AO had treated Assessee as beneficiary of accommodation entries & made additions on account of (i) commission income from cash transportation & entry facilitation, (ii) unexplained investment of ₹10 lakh, & (iii...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 68 Additions Fail: Documentary Evidence Cannot Be Ignored Without Enquiry Commission Disallowance Remanded – 133(6) Non-Response Not Sufficient; Ad-hoc Expenses Cut to 10% Stamp Duty vs Actual Value Dispute: ITAT Orders DVO Valuation ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Penalty U/s 272A(1)(d) Deleted: Reasonable Cause Subsequent Compliance Accepted View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930