NCLAT Delhi held that order directing vacation of premise granted under leave and licence agreements granted by Corporate Debtor due to CIRP is justifiable. Accordingly, impugned order upheld and additional time grated to vacate the premises.
ITAT Nagpur held that deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act admissible in case of interest earned from fixed deposit with bank. Accordingly, deduction claimed by the assessee is allowed by deleting the addition.
The ITAT Delhi sets aside a Rs.1.03 Cr addition to a trader’s income, ruling that the creditor balance cannot be taxed under Section 68 when the AO accepts the substantial volume of sales and corresponding purchases.
ITAT Delhi allows NRI’s appeal in Chirag Kirpal Vs ACIT, ruling that the Jurisdictional AO (JAO) lacks the power to issue a Section 148 notice after the Faceless Reassessment Scheme (s.151A) took effect.
The ITAT Delhi sets aside over ₹1112 Cr in tax additions in Enormous Nivesh Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT, ruling that Section 56(2)(viia) applies only to the ‘transfer’ of shares, not the ‘fresh allotment’ (issue) of shares, which is governed by Section 56(2)(viib).
ITAT Delhi held that regular assessment order passed under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act without aid of section 153C despite satisfaction note from AO of searched person is not supportable in law. Thus, assessment framed u/s. 143(3) is void ab-initio.
The Delhi High Court mandates refund with statutory interest when a taxpayer’s GST refund is wrongly adjusted against an outstanding liability that was subsequently cancelled.
CESTAT Mumbai held that re-deployment of auxiliary equipment post completion of project doesn’t amount to violation of Project Import Regulations, 1986. Accordingly, appeal allowed and impugned order is set aside.
The tribunal ruled that stating “for objects of the trust” in Form 10 is sufficient if supported by a Board Resolution specifying use for scholarships. Disallowance by CIT(A) was set aside, highlighting substance over form in charitable trusts.
The Delhi High Court, citing Section 83(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 and judicial precedent, ordered the lifting of the provisional attachment on M/s Kanta Food Product’s bank account.
