NCLAT Delhi held that no authorized correspondence brought on record which states that there was agreement between appellant and corporate debtor to cost incurred by appellant would be settled against license fee payable to Corporate Debtor. Thus, argument of appellant rejected.
The Allahabad High Court quashed GST orders in the J.T. Steel Traders case, holding that proceedings for excess stock must use sections 73/74, not the penal section 130.
Delhi High Court directs banks to unfreeze Unity Traders’ accounts after an appeal was filed against the original tax order. The ruling highlights the automatic stay granted by filing an appeal under the CGST Act.
ITAT Raipur held that passing of CIT(A) order was ex-parte without hearing the assessee and there is sufficient cause shown by assessee in not attending hearings as per opportunities granted by CIT(A). Accordingly, matter remanded back to CIT(A).
Delhi High Court held that there was no requirement to resort to Clause 25(c) of GTC to formally notify the ICA for appointment of the Arbitrator and notice sent by invoking arbitration agreement u/s. 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is valid invocation.
ITAT Jaipur quashes ₹1.5 crore addition against Amar Partap Steels, ruling that uncorroborated statements cannot prove bogus loans.
Apple India’s request to amend a customs ruling on the classification of its HomePod was denied. The Customs Authority cited a previous court decision on similar devices.
CAAR Delhi classifies Mitsubishi Electric’s Inverter Assembly Units for hybrid vehicles under 8504 40 90 and confirms eligibility for duty exemption under India-Japan CEPA.
Summary of the Tamil Nadu GST AAR ruling for Sundaram Industries on the classification of imported goods and the jurisdiction of the authority.
The ITAT Delhi has quashed a reassessment order against Sumit Suneja, finding that the AO quoted a repealed section of law and received a mechanical, undated approval.
