Income Tax - We know that before Finance Act, 2020 a dividend received from a domestic company is exempt in the hands of shareholders. Because company declaring dividend is required to pay Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) under provisions of Section 115O of the Income Tax Act,1961 before crediting amount of dividend into account of shareholders. Many b...
Income Tax - Salient Features on Deduction us 80M with other ancillary aspects of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Amidst high expectations the Finance Bill, 2020 was presented by Hon’ble Finance Minister before The House of Parliament on 1st February 2020. The Finance Bill, 2020 proposes 104 amendments including Re-Taxation of Dividend Income in the hands ...
Income Tax - A. Existing Provisions relating to dividend taxation: (i) Tax implication in the hands of company: Under the existing laws, even though dividend constituted income in the hands of the shareholders, the tax on such dividend was payable by the company which declared dividend, @ 15% of the gross dividend under section 115-O (plus surcharge a...
Income Tax - 1) Deductions u/s 80M is a Deduction not an exemption. The very basic difference between exemption & deduction is that losses from the sources of income which is otherwise exempted had no tax treatment & however losses from a income which a allowed as deduction shall have tax treatment in accordance with the provisions of [&hellip...
Income Tax - In Finance Bill, 2020 (Bill) , one of the Biggest move of the government was abolishing the DDT charged u/s 115-O of the Income Tax Act , 1961 (the Act). However government has inserted/ amended certain sections to make the Dividend income taxable in the hands of receiver by removing Section 10(34) of the Act. […]...
PCIT Vs SIL Investments Ltd. (Delhi High Court) - Delhi High Court held that disallowance under section 80M of the Income Tax Act to the extent of divided distributed to the shareholders unsustainable in law. Accordingly, disallowance rightly deleted by CIT(A)....
Grasim Industries Ltd Vs CIT (ITAT Mumbai) - In present facts of the case, the Hon’ble Tribunal held that expenses made pertaining to Club Membership fees shall be allowed as business expenditure....
Jaguar and Company Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) - ITAT Delhi held that reopening of assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act unjustified in absence of failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all the material facts....
State Bank of India Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) - The law is now well settled that for the purpose of deduction u/s.80M of the Act, only actual expenditure incurred has to be taken into consideration and there cannot be any estimate of expenditure that could be made thereon....
PCIT Vs SIL Investments Ltd. (Delhi High Court) -
Grasim Industries Ltd Vs CIT (ITAT Mumbai) -
Jaguar and Company Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) -
State Bank of India Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) -