Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : PCIT Vs SIL Investments Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

PCIT Vs SIL Investments Ltd. (Delhi High Court)

Delhi High Court held that disallowance under section 80M of the Income Tax Act to the extent of divided distributed to the shareholders unsustainable in law. Accordingly, disallowance rightly deleted by CIT(A).

Facts- The assessed income factored in included two disallowances: i) disallowance of deduction claimed by the respondent/assessee under Section 80IA/80IB, amounting to Rs. 4,32,65,725/- on the ground that profits of two (2) eligible units were n

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. Ram S says:

    80M is certainly right. When it was introduced I remember our we invested cadhflow surplus is US64 where Dividend was assured everyyear. We planned that by interim Dividend this is distributed and a final before filing return. How can the company sleep on this subject.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
May 2025
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031