Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that an addition under Section 69A cannot be sustained when the assessee is denied the opportunity to cross-exami...
Income Tax : Income without satisfactory explanation is taxed at a special high rate under Section 115BBE. The provisions place strict liabilit...
Income Tax : Explains the centralization of digital platforms, surveillance powers, and opaque governance. Key takeaway: citizens have limited ...
Income Tax : Detailed overview of penalties under various sections of the Income Tax Act, covering defaults in tax payment, reporting, document...
Income Tax : An overview of Sections 68-69D of India's Income-tax Act, which empower tax authorities to assess unaccounted income from unexplai...
Corporate Law : Details on Indian government's blocking of YouTube channels, citing IT Rules 2021 and Section 69A of IT Act 2000. Learn about reas...
Income Tax : ITAT Indore held that appellate order violated principles of natural justice after finding that key hearing notices were sent to a...
Income Tax : ITAT Rajkot held that cash deposits made during demonetization were fully supported by audited books of account, cash books, and b...
Income Tax : ITAT Hyderabad held that addition of Rs. 13 lakh under Section 69A through rectification proceedings exceeded the scope of Section...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that the reassessment notice issued on 26.07.2022 was beyond the permissible timeline under the surviving limita...
Income Tax : Tribunal dismissed a Revenue appeal after finding that additions were made solely on basis of entries in a seized Excel file. It h...
Bombay High Court dismisses Revenue’s appeal in Refrigerated Distributors case, ruling no substantial law question arose on profit estimate for bogus purchases.
Understand income tax rules for cash deposits in businesses using presumptive taxation (Sec 44AD, 44AE). Learn about unexplained credits and bank statements.
Tax tribunal remits Vijay Kumar Sharma assessment to CIT(A) for fresh hearing, citing non-compliance due to business hardship after demonetization.
ITAT Surat permits Asifiqbal Ismail Jangda’s appeal, removing a ₹3.45 lakh unexplained cash addition. Agricultural income and bank withdrawal proof cited.
ITAT Ahmedabad restores ₹15.88 lakh reassessment addition, directs AO to re-verify cash deposits after considering evidence overlooked by lower authorities.
Delhi High Court held that since AY 2012-13 falls beyond the block of ten years that are required to be reckoned from the end of the AY 2022-23 assuming jurisdiction u/s. 153C in respect of AY 2012-13 is invalid. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that claim of assessee that income declared under Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana [PMGKY] and hence the same should not be treated as unexplained deposits needs verification. Hence, matter remitted to AO to verify the same.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition under section 69A of the Income Tax Act not sustained since three key ingredients i.e. identity, genuineness and creditworthiness of parties being proved. Accordingly, appeal of assessee allowed.
ITAT Delhi remits ex-parte order against Sohanvir Singh to AO, citing denial of adequate opportunity of being heard, upholding natural justice.
Ahmedabad ITAT rules cash deposits by Amul parlour owner explained by sales, deletes ₹27 lakh addition under Section 69A.
