Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that an addition under Section 69A cannot be sustained when the assessee is denied the opportunity to cross-exami...
Income Tax : Income without satisfactory explanation is taxed at a special high rate under Section 115BBE. The provisions place strict liabilit...
Income Tax : Explains the centralization of digital platforms, surveillance powers, and opaque governance. Key takeaway: citizens have limited ...
Income Tax : Detailed overview of penalties under various sections of the Income Tax Act, covering defaults in tax payment, reporting, document...
Income Tax : An overview of Sections 68-69D of India's Income-tax Act, which empower tax authorities to assess unaccounted income from unexplai...
Corporate Law : Details on Indian government's blocking of YouTube channels, citing IT Rules 2021 and Section 69A of IT Act 2000. Learn about reas...
Income Tax : ITAT Indore held that appellate order violated principles of natural justice after finding that key hearing notices were sent to a...
Income Tax : ITAT Rajkot held that cash deposits made during demonetization were fully supported by audited books of account, cash books, and b...
Income Tax : ITAT Hyderabad held that addition of Rs. 13 lakh under Section 69A through rectification proceedings exceeded the scope of Section...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that the reassessment notice issued on 26.07.2022 was beyond the permissible timeline under the surviving limita...
Income Tax : Tribunal dismissed a Revenue appeal after finding that additions were made solely on basis of entries in a seized Excel file. It h...
Appellant contended that since he had filed income tax returns under section 44AD of the Act, which does not require maintenance of books of account, section 69A was not applicable.
In the Satishbhai Kadvabhai Sarvaiya Vs ITO case, ITAT Rajkot rules that during demonetization, deposits don’t warrant addition under U/s 69A if adequately explained.
Hyderabad ITAT grants additional opportunity to taxpayer to explain nature & source of cash deposits made during demonetization. Read full text.
Detailed analysis of ITAT Ahmedabad’s order regarding CIT(A)’s authority to delete disallowance without considering AO’s findings under Income Tax Act, 1961.
Understand the verdict of Vishakhapatnam ITAT on unexplained cash deposits. Detailed analysis on taxpayer’s explanation, legal provisions, and conclusions.
Explore the intricacies of gold taxation in India, covering physical gold, paper gold, gold derivatives, inheritance tax, and compliance measures.
In the case of Pukhraj Nathmal Jain Vs ITO, ITAT Mumbai deletes addition u/s 68 of Income Tax Act, as the source for deposits made during demonetisation period was substantiated.
Discover the significance of Surat ITAT’s ruling on digital evidence in tax cases. Learn how the case of Shanker Nebhumal Uttamchandani v. ACIT sheds light on the use of WhatsApp images in assessments.
Analyzing the case of Sunil Dhirubhai Patel vs ITO, where expenses were disallowed despite not being claimed by the assessee, and how the ITAT Ahmedabad ruled in favor of the assessee.
Bangalore ITAT remits the case back to the AO for fresh consideration, citing enhancement made to taxpayer’s income without following procedures under Sec 154.
