Income Tax : Learn how different types of income tax assessments are conducted under the Income-tax Act. The FAQs explain assessment procedures...
Income Tax : This guide explains who is required to maintain books of account under Section 44AA based on business, profession, turnover, and i...
Income Tax : This guide explains the various assessments under the Income-tax Act, including summary assessment, scrutiny assessment, best judg...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that an addition under Section 69A cannot be sustained when the assessee is denied the opportunity to cross-exami...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that CIT(A) cannot enhance income under Section 251 on matters not considered by the Assessing Officer during as...
Income Tax : Learn about the new block assessment provisions for cases involving searches under section 132 and requisitions under section 132A...
Income Tax : Discover how Finance Act 2021 revamped assessment and reassessment procedures under Income-tax Act, impacting notices, time limits...
Income Tax : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association requested CBDT to issue Clarification in respect of the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme...
Income Tax : In view of Indiscriminate notices by income Tax Department without allowing reasonable time it is requested to Finance Ministry an...
Income Tax : Lucknow CA Tax Practicioners Association has made a Representation to FM for Extension of Time Limit for Assessment cases time bar...
Income Tax : The Gujarat High Court held that reassessment cannot be sustained merely because of high-value bank transactions without evidence ...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that an addition under Section 68 cannot be sustained solely on information received from the Investigation Wi...
Income Tax : The ITAT Hyderabad held that the entire sale consideration could not be assessed as short-term capital gains without examining the...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune held that the reassessment proceedings were invalid because the notice under Section 148 was approved by the Principal C...
Income Tax : ITAT held that interest earned by a co-operative credit society from deposits with a co-operative bank remained attributable to it...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Excise Duty : Notification No. 29/2024-Central Excise rescinds six 2022 excise notifications in the public interest, effective immediately. Deta...
Income Tax : Learn how to initiate proceedings under section 147 of the IT Act in e-Verification cases. Detailed instructions for Assessing Off...
Income Tax : Explore e-Verification Instruction No. 2 of 2024 from the Directorate of Income Tax (Systems). Detailed guidelines for AOs under I...
Income Tax : Supreme Court in the matter of Shri Ashish Agarwal, several representations were received asking for time-barring date of such cas...
Gauhati High Court rules that AO names cannot be reflected in notices issued under Section 148 in a faceless manner, reaffirming procedures under Section 151A.
Delhi HC directs obtaining instructions in BT India Pvt Ltd vs PCIT case, discussing dismissal of revision application under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Bangalore rules interest income from SBI investments not eligible for deduction under Section 80P. Full analysis of Farmers Coop Society vs ITO case.
Read the detailed analysis of Sumit Maheshwari Vs ITO case where ITAT Delhi deletes penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of Income Tax Act due to failure in serving notice.
Learn about the penalty of Rs. 31.83 Lakh imposed by the MCA for issuing shares in physical mode instead of DEMAT mode in the Biogenomics case.
ITAT Kolkata quashes notice under Section 148 as AO fails to verify credible information. Insightful analysis of R.S. Darshan Singh Motor Car Finance Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO.
Gokal Chand Rattan Chand vs. Union of India: Detailed analysis of Punjab & Haryana High Court’s judgment on non-existent tax order & auction.
Calcutta High Court stays Section 148 notice for 2016-17 due to limitation issues and pending appeal. Jurisdictional conflicts lead to stay on further proceedings.
Delhi High Court rules that reassessment actions post-2021 searches must meet the First Proviso to Section 149(1) of the Income Tax Act, quashing Dinesh Jindal case notice.
Delhi High Court invalidates reassessment proceedings against Samsung India for AY 2002-03, ruling lack of fresh tangible material after 4 years.
