Audit objections alone do not fulfill criteria for reopening assessments: Delhi HC

PCIT Vs Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court)

Reassessment proceedings cannot be initiated after a lapse of four years in absence of new tangible material and audit objections alone do not fulfill the criteria for reopening assessments

The case of PCIT vs Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd. revolves around the validity of reassessment proceedings initiated by the Revenue for the Assessment Year (AY) 2002-03, specifically concerning whether there was sufficient new tangible material to justify reopening the assessment after the lapse of four years.Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.