Income Tax : Courts have held that non-compliance with mandatory procedures under Section 144B renders faceless assessment orders void. The rul...
Income Tax : Budget 2026 introduces sweeping retrospective amendments affecting limitation, reassessment jurisdiction, DIN validity, and TPO ti...
Income Tax : The ITAT held that an assessment completed before receiving the DVO report under section 50C(2) is invalid. All additions and disa...
Income Tax : Overview of the Faceless Scheme for Income Tax: electronic assessments, appeals, penalties, and rectifications with no physical in...
Income Tax : Faceless Income-tax proceedings and e-assessments under Section 144B simplify taxpayer compliance. Use the e-filing portal for ele...
Income Tax : In view of Indiscriminate notices by income Tax Department without allowing reasonable time it is requested to Finance Ministry an...
Income Tax : Lucknow CA Tax Practicioners Association has made a Representation to FM for Extension of Time Limit for Assessment cases time bar...
Income Tax : The Kerala High Court, today admitted a batch of Writ Petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Faceless Assessment...
Income Tax : ITAT Indore held that appellate order violated principles of natural justice after finding that key hearing notices were sent to a...
Income Tax : The Hyderabad ITAT held that purchases cannot be treated as bogus merely because the supplier failed to respond to a notice under ...
Income Tax : Tribunal noted the assessee’s contention that only his share in jointly owned properties could be taxed instead of the entire tr...
Income Tax : Tribunal held that deduction for bad debts is allowable in the year in which the debts are actually written off in the books of ac...
Income Tax : Court upheld the validity of the Section 148 notice but set aside the assessment order after finding that notices were sent to an ...
Income Tax : CBDT issues guidelines for IT verification under Section 144B(5), detailing circumstances for digital and physical checks, effecti...
Income Tax : In pursuance of sub-section (3) of section 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby makes the fo...
Income Tax : Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Assessment Unit (AU), Verification Unit (VU), Technical Unit (TU) and Review Unit (RU) unde...
Income Tax : Roll out of first phase of changes in ITBA functionalities for Faceless Assessment due to amendments in Section 144B by Finance Ac...
Income Tax : National Faceless Penalty Centre, in accordance with the guidelines issued by the Board, may,–– (a) in a case where imposit...
Read the full text of the order from ITAT Agra where penalty u/s 271B was deleted for Tasavver Husain vs ITO. Detailed analysis and conclusion provided.
Detailed analysis of Alubound Dacs India Private Limited vs. DCIT case before ITAT Mumbai regarding the allowance of Section 80G deduction on CSR expenditure.
ITAT Chennai’s order regarding the transfer from current to deposit account as non-income, and deletion of addition. Full text of the order provided.
Read the detailed analysis of Chandran Sarath Vs ACIT case by Kerala High Court where no income assessable to tax resulted in the dismissal of appeal. Full judgment text included.
Assessee was a commercial bank having its head office in France and had 8 branches in India. Assessee was involved in normal banking activities including financing of foreign trade and foreign exchange transaction
In the case of DCIT vs. Paranjapee Schemes Construction Ltd., ITAT Mumbai rules no disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act is warranted for investments not yielding tax-free income.
Explore crucial rulings in case of Interglobe Technology Quotient Pvt Ltd vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) regarding CSR expenditure disallowance and TDS credit allowance, along with detailed analysis.
Sec. 144B mandates AO to offer a hearing post show-cause notice. If requested, personal hearing is obligatory, not discretionary, in assessment.
Understand the significance of personal hearings in faceless assessments as mandated by a recent Allahabad High Court judgment. Get insights into the implications for taxpayers.
Madras High Court dismisses writ petition challenging revision order under Section 263 of IT Act, directing pursuit of statutory appeal.
