Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : Learn the updated provisions governing rectification, assessments, reassessments, and appeals under the Income-tax Act. This guide...
Income Tax : The article explains how the Finance Acts, 2025 and 2026 have reshaped the Updated Return regime under Section 139(8A). It highlig...
Income Tax : The article explains that 30 June is the Department's deadline to issue scrutiny notices for eligible returns, not a filing deadli...
Income Tax : The Income Tax Department explains how faceless assessments under Section 144B operate through the e-Filing portal without requiri...
Income Tax : Read how Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association addresses last-minute case reallocations affecting timely issuance of notices...
Income Tax : The Supreme Court has ruled that it is mandatory for the Income Tax Department to issue notice within the prescribed time limit of...
Income Tax : Where unaccounted sales were established through seized material, only the net profit embedded therein was liable to tax, and not ...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held that additions made in an intimation under Section 143(1) cannot be disputed in an appeal against a scrutiny a...
Income Tax : Interest on delayed payment of the FM radio migration fee was a compensatory business expenditure deductible under Section 37(1); ...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai remanded the case to examine whether Section 56(2)(x) applied based on the agreement date and to consider refund of ex...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai deleted a Section 69 addition after finding documentary evidence established joint ownership, source of funds, and ear...
Income Tax : Understand the guidelines set by the Indian Ministry of Finance for the compulsory selection of returns for complete scrutiny duri...
Income Tax : CBDT hereby authorises the Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax/Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax (NaFAC) having her / his headqua...
Income Tax : The three formats of notice(s) are: Limited Scrutiny (Computer Aided Scrutiny Selection}, Complete Scrutiny (Computer Aided Scruti...
Income Tax : Central Board of Direct Taxes, with approval of the Revenue Secretary, has decided to modify notice under section 143(2) of the In...
Income Tax : Instruction No.1/2015 Clarification regarding applicability of section 143(1D) of the Income-tax Act, 1961- Vide Finance Act, 2012...
Read the full text of the ITAT Mumbai order in DCIT vs. Dilip B. Jiwrajka covering appeals against additions of unexplained income and commission under IT Act sections 68 & 69C for AYs 2012-13 to 2015-16.
Read how Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association addresses last-minute case reallocations affecting timely issuance of notices. Insights into systemic challenges and proposed solutions.
Explore the Delhi High Court’s judgment on ITSC’s conclusive nature for AY, assessing reassessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Full text and detailed analysis included.
Madras HC nullifies IT assessment for Muthu Pitchamuthu Prabu, highlighting procedural lapses and non-consideration of key documents. Read detailed analysis.
Understand the implications of receiving a notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. Learn how to respond, time limits, and consequences. Get detailed insights here.
ITAT Mumbai rules on DCIT vs Gem and Jewellery Export Promotion Council case, clarifying exhibition activities are not trade and commerce under Section 2(15) of the IT Act.
Read the detailed analysis of Coonoor Sri Thanthi Mariamman Kerala Seva Sangam vs Assessment Unit judgment by Madras High Court. Learn why the court overturned the assessment order due to a breach of natural justice.
Himachal Pradesh HC sets aside order U/S 143(3) of the Income Tax Act due to insufficient response time for SCN, remits case back to PCIT for reconsideration.
Detailed analysis of the ITAT Jodhpur decision in Gaurav Purohit vs PCIT, covering the grounds of appeal, legal arguments, and implications for future cases.
Assessee has placed sufficient documents and materials on record to prove identity and creditworthiness of shareholders and genuineness of transaction of receiving share capital and share premium, invoking provisions of Section 68 of was not justified
