This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT Kolkata: Penalty Deleted – AO Cannot Demand P&L for Section 44AD Income
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Prem Kumar Goutam Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Kolkata
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Prem Kumar Goutam Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)
Introduction: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Kolkata recently delivered a verdict in the case of Prem Kumar Goutam vs. DCIT, addressing the imposition of a penalty under section 270A of the Income Tax Act. The dispute centered on whether the Assessing Officer (AO) could require the taxpayer to produce a Profit and Loss Account to justify expenditures not recorded in Gross Receipt under section 44AD. This article provides an analysis of the ITAT’s decision.
Detailed Analysis: The case involved the appellant, who was a brick kiln dealer an...




