Income Tax : ITAT held that a return filed under section 148 remains valid even if delayed. Failure to issue mandatory notice under section 143...
Income Tax : Tribunal held that an assessment is void when the competent officer does not issue the mandatory notice. Jurisdiction cannot arise...
Income Tax : A surge in Section 143(2) notices was triggered by the June 2025 limitation deadline. This explains why cases were picked and how ...
Income Tax : Automated risk alerts are delaying income-tax refunds without clear reasons. The law allows withholding only through statutory pro...
Income Tax : Faceless Income-tax proceedings and e-assessments under Section 144B simplify taxpayer compliance. Use the e-filing portal for ele...
Income Tax : Read how Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association addresses last-minute case reallocations affecting timely issuance of notices...
Income Tax : The Supreme Court has ruled that it is mandatory for the Income Tax Department to issue notice within the prescribed time limit of...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT held that Dividend Distribution Tax paid on dividends to non-resident shareholders could be restricted to the treaty ra...
Income Tax : The Hyderabad ITAT held that purchases cannot be treated as bogus merely because the supplier failed to respond to a notice under ...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that the assessee was covered under the search proceedings even though its name did not specifically appear in the...
Income Tax : Court ruled that reassessment notices under Section 148 must be issued through the faceless mechanism under Section 151A and the 2...
Income Tax : ITAT Hyderabad held that addition of Rs. 13 lakh under Section 69A through rectification proceedings exceeded the scope of Section...
Income Tax : Understand the guidelines set by the Indian Ministry of Finance for the compulsory selection of returns for complete scrutiny duri...
Income Tax : CBDT hereby authorises the Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax/Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax (NaFAC) having her / his headqua...
Income Tax : The three formats of notice(s) are: Limited Scrutiny (Computer Aided Scrutiny Selection}, Complete Scrutiny (Computer Aided Scruti...
Income Tax : Central Board of Direct Taxes, with approval of the Revenue Secretary, has decided to modify notice under section 143(2) of the In...
Income Tax : Instruction No.1/2015 Clarification regarding applicability of section 143(1D) of the Income-tax Act, 1961- Vide Finance Act, 2012...
ITAT Delhi held that “full value of consideration” or “cost of investment” cannot be substituted by the fair market value (FMV), except in the case falling within the purview of 50C and Sec. 56(l)(vi)/(vii) of the Income Tax Act.
In light of ongoing NCLT insolvency proceedings, ITAT Mumbai orders Jet Airways to contribute Rs 25,000 to the Prime Minister Relief Fund, emphasizing the importance of compliance.
Chandigarh ITAT allows additional evidence in assessments under section 144, ensuring fair taxpayer treatment and legal compliance.
Rajkot ITAT confirms gross profit estimation and stock addition for Raghuvanshi Cotton Ginning, highlighting the importance of accurate stock reporting.
Mumbai ITAT decision clarifies that no addition under Section 69 I-T Act is justified once the source of investment is proven, setting a precedent.
In the case of Rajesh Lakhmshi Nisar Vs ITO, Mumbai ITAT admitted additional evidence, emphasizing taxpayers shouldn’t be penalized for not submitting material evidence.
ITAT Delhi deletes addition under section 69A of Income Tax Act in Viren Bakhru vs. ACIT case. Assessee’s explanation of cash deposit during demonetization accepted.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal upholds denial of LTCG exemption on shares of Kappac Pharma Limited. Read the full analysis of this remarkable decision & its implications on taxpayers.
ITAT Mumbai held that benefit of Article 13(4) of India Mauritius tax Treaty duly available to Mauritius registered assessee, having Tax Residency Certificate, for sale of shares which were acquired prior to 1st April 2017.
Analysis of Leelaben Kantilal Parekh Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) case discussing the validity of a reopening notice under section 148 and addition under section 69C for bogus purchases.
