Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : Learn the updated provisions governing rectification, assessments, reassessments, and appeals under the Income-tax Act. This guide...
Income Tax : The article explains how the Finance Acts, 2025 and 2026 have reshaped the Updated Return regime under Section 139(8A). It highlig...
Income Tax : The article explains that 30 June is the Department's deadline to issue scrutiny notices for eligible returns, not a filing deadli...
Income Tax : The Income Tax Department explains how faceless assessments under Section 144B operate through the e-Filing portal without requiri...
Income Tax : Read how Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association addresses last-minute case reallocations affecting timely issuance of notices...
Income Tax : The Supreme Court has ruled that it is mandatory for the Income Tax Department to issue notice within the prescribed time limit of...
Income Tax : Where unaccounted sales were established through seized material, only the net profit embedded therein was liable to tax, and not ...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held that additions made in an intimation under Section 143(1) cannot be disputed in an appeal against a scrutiny a...
Income Tax : Interest on delayed payment of the FM radio migration fee was a compensatory business expenditure deductible under Section 37(1); ...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai remanded the case to examine whether Section 56(2)(x) applied based on the agreement date and to consider refund of ex...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai deleted a Section 69 addition after finding documentary evidence established joint ownership, source of funds, and ear...
Income Tax : Understand the guidelines set by the Indian Ministry of Finance for the compulsory selection of returns for complete scrutiny duri...
Income Tax : CBDT hereby authorises the Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax/Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax (NaFAC) having her / his headqua...
Income Tax : The three formats of notice(s) are: Limited Scrutiny (Computer Aided Scrutiny Selection}, Complete Scrutiny (Computer Aided Scruti...
Income Tax : Central Board of Direct Taxes, with approval of the Revenue Secretary, has decided to modify notice under section 143(2) of the In...
Income Tax : Instruction No.1/2015 Clarification regarding applicability of section 143(1D) of the Income-tax Act, 1961- Vide Finance Act, 2012...
Calcutta High Court upholds reopening of assessment for a company receiving cash credit from a shell entity providing bogus LTCG/STCG, citing valid reasons and assessee’s failure to explain the transaction.
ITAT Mumbai held that income from the shareholders’ account was held to be taxable as income from life insurance business. Accordingly, income from shareholders’ account is taxable under the head “Profits and Gains of Business or Profession”. Thus, appeal of revenue dismissed.
The Revenue alleges that the appellants/assessee got the said company CCL incorporated only for the purpose acquiring properties in UK by which he could avoid declaration of the ownership in the properties in India.
ITAT Chandigarh held that every error is not required to be corrected under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act. Revisionary proceedings u/s. 263 quashed as plausible view taken by the Assessing Officer.
Calcutta High Court held that reopening of assessment u/s. 147 for claim of bogus capital gain sustained fundamentals of company are very weak and abnormal price rise in share is artificially manipulated.
The present petition is filed assailing the Communication dated 03 February 2014 issued by the Respondent No. 3 rejecting the Petitioner’s Application dated 15 December 2011 for seeking amendments of the earlier granted approval dated 17.11.2006.
ITAT Ahmedabad deletes Rs. 15 lakh cash deposit addition during demonetization, finding assessee established source through prior bank withdrawals.
ITAT Bangalore condoned a 139-day delay in an appeal by Gautham Kempanna, remanding the case for fresh assessment despite the assessee’s non-response to notices, conditional on a Rs. 20,000 payment to the PM’s Relief Fund.
Delhi High Court sends Pushpa Saluja’s appeal back to ITAT, questioning Section 68 application on alleged bogus purchases and full addition.
The ITAT Chennai has remanded the case of Dr. Anbu Selvan vs. ITO, involving Rs. 50.5 lakh in unexplained money, back to the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal cited the AO’s failure to specify transaction details, allowing for fresh consideration.
