Income Tax : ITAT held that a return filed under section 148 remains valid even if delayed. Failure to issue mandatory notice under section 143...
Income Tax : Tribunal held that an assessment is void when the competent officer does not issue the mandatory notice. Jurisdiction cannot arise...
Income Tax : A surge in Section 143(2) notices was triggered by the June 2025 limitation deadline. This explains why cases were picked and how ...
Income Tax : Automated risk alerts are delaying income-tax refunds without clear reasons. The law allows withholding only through statutory pro...
Income Tax : Faceless Income-tax proceedings and e-assessments under Section 144B simplify taxpayer compliance. Use the e-filing portal for ele...
Income Tax : Read how Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association addresses last-minute case reallocations affecting timely issuance of notices...
Income Tax : The Supreme Court has ruled that it is mandatory for the Income Tax Department to issue notice within the prescribed time limit of...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT held that Dividend Distribution Tax paid on dividends to non-resident shareholders could be restricted to the treaty ra...
Income Tax : The Hyderabad ITAT held that purchases cannot be treated as bogus merely because the supplier failed to respond to a notice under ...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that the assessee was covered under the search proceedings even though its name did not specifically appear in the...
Income Tax : Court ruled that reassessment notices under Section 148 must be issued through the faceless mechanism under Section 151A and the 2...
Income Tax : ITAT Hyderabad held that addition of Rs. 13 lakh under Section 69A through rectification proceedings exceeded the scope of Section...
Income Tax : Understand the guidelines set by the Indian Ministry of Finance for the compulsory selection of returns for complete scrutiny duri...
Income Tax : CBDT hereby authorises the Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax/Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax (NaFAC) having her / his headqua...
Income Tax : The three formats of notice(s) are: Limited Scrutiny (Computer Aided Scrutiny Selection}, Complete Scrutiny (Computer Aided Scruti...
Income Tax : Central Board of Direct Taxes, with approval of the Revenue Secretary, has decided to modify notice under section 143(2) of the In...
Income Tax : Instruction No.1/2015 Clarification regarding applicability of section 143(1D) of the Income-tax Act, 1961- Vide Finance Act, 2012...
Ahmedabad ITAT upholds disallowance of Section 35(1)(ii) tax deduction for donation to Shri Arvindo Institute as trust’s approval had expired in 2006.
ITAT Delhi remits ex-parte order against Sohanvir Singh to AO, citing denial of adequate opportunity of being heard, upholding natural justice.
ITAT Pune held that delay in filing of an appeal before CIT(A) condoned due to company’s financial position and non-pursuing of appeals by tax consultant. Accordingly, matter remitted to file of CIT(A) for denovo adjudication.
ITAT Kolkata rules assessment void due to non-issuance of mandatory notice u/s 143(2) in Sandip Kumar Keshari Vs ITO case.
Delhi High Court held that initiation of reassessment proceedings by issuance of notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act is not sustainable in law in as much as the same is barred by limitation as stipulated u/s. 149 (1) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Hyderabad partially upholds AO’s addition for unexplained cash deposit by Shri Balineni Kishore Babu, confirming ₹48,000 due to lack of source proof.
ITAT Kolkata held that re-assessment proceedings initiated under section 148 of the Income Tax Act without any tangible material and without independent application of mind is not sustainable in law. Accordingly, reassessment is quashed.
ITAT Mumbai held that PCIT is empowered to issue a show- cause notice and pass a revision order u/s. 263 of the Act when reassessment order passed by AO was quite cryptic. Accordingly, order of PCIT upheld and appeal of assessee dismissed.
ITAT Pune held that application of cash received from unrecorded cash sales needs verification since assessee claims that it is applied for giving advance to the farmers for purchase of raw material and also for expansion of the existing showroom.
ITAT Hyderabad held that profit estimation cannot be arbitrary or without any basis. Accordingly, estimation of profit @6% on total contract receipts is reduced to 4%. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee allowed.
