CA, CS, CMA : Focusing only on receivables can miss significant risks embedded in related-party payables. A bilateral review reveals internal gr...
Company Law : The article explains when Audit Committee, Board, and shareholder approvals are required for Related Party Transactions. It provid...
Company Law : The article explains how Audit Committee, Board, and shareholder approvals apply to related party transactions under corporate law...
Company Law : The analysis clarified that shareholder protection is ensured through ultimate parent consolidation. Hence, intermediate companies...
SEBI : The updated Regulation 23 framework introduces turnover-linked thresholds for related party transactions. Listed companies must re...
Company Law : The Ministry of Corporate Affairs details measures to ensure transparency and prevent fund diversion in Related-Party Transactions...
SEBI : SEBI is consulting on amendments to LODR Regulations regarding Related Party Transactions. Proposals include new materiality thres...
Company Law : NFRA highlights auditor responsibilities in related party transactions, emphasizing compliance with Ind AS 24, SEBI regulations, a...
SEBI : SEBI seeks public feedback on strengthening secretarial compliance reports, auditor appointment criteria, and related party transa...
SEBI : What does ‘Where a transaction is undertaken between members of the consolidated entity (between the listed entity and its subsi...
Excise Duty : CESTAT Chandigarh held that the manufacturer and marketing company could not be treated as related persons under the Central Excis...
Income Tax : In a landmark ruling, the Delhi High Court held that government shareholders are not automatically considered related parties und...
SEBI : A detailed analysis of SAT Mumbai's decision to reduce SecureKloud Technologies' penalty for non-serious LODR violations, and its ...
Company Law : Bar of voting as per Section 188 of the Companies Act, 2013 on related parties operated only at the time of entering into a contra...
Income Tax : Commissioner issued a show cause notice under section 263 and ultimately passed impugned order; by that time the alleged domestic ...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai penalised a company and its directors for failing to disclose a related party loan transaction in the Board’s Report ...
Company Law : The authority penalized directors for executing related party transactions without fresh or valid approvals. It held that reliance...
Company Law : The company relied on old resolutions for ongoing related party transactions. The authority held that fresh approvals are mandator...
Company Law : The company continued related party transactions based on old approvals. The authority held that fresh approvals are mandatory, le...
Company Law : The issue involved non-compliance with approval requirements for related party transactions. The authority held that absence of Bo...
MCA imposes a ₹20 lakh penalty on Janaki Ram Steel and Power Pvt Ltd for non-disclosure of related party transactions from FY 2015-16 to FY 2019-20.
The MCA imposes a Rs 4 lakh penalty on Trichy Fabricators Pvt Ltd for failing to disclose related party transactions in Form AOC-2. Learn more about the adjudication order.
Get insights into the penalty imposed by the Registrar of Companies, Coimbatore, on M/s. Arise Industries and Agency Private Limited for violation of Section 134 of the Companies Act, 2013.
MCA imposes Rs. 2.25 Lakh Penalty on M/s. Martin Windfarms Pvt. Ltd. & Directors for erroneous disclosure under Section 134 of Companies Act, 2013.
MCA imposes Rs. 2 Lakh penalty on M/s. D P F Textiles Pvt Ltd for inaccurate disclosure of Related Party transaction value under Section 134 of Companies Act, 2013.
MCA penalizes M/s Anmol Ferro Impex Private Limited for failing to disclose related party transactions of directors and MCA imposes ₹10.5 Lakh Penalty
Explore discrepancies in disclosures of senior management, directors, and key personnel in listed companies, highlighting non-compliance and regulatory implications.
Explore the Supreme Court judgment in RT Agro vs SEBI case, highlighting the importance of balanced regulatory oversight in related party transactions.
Kudos Finance faces Rs. 20 Lakh penalty from MCA for not holding board meeting to approve related party transaction, violating Section 188 of Companies Act.
The violation stemmed from the company’s failure to attach the required annexure (Form AOC-2) relating to the particulars of contracts or arrangements with related parties, despite stating compliance with Section 188 of the Companies Act, 2013, in its Board Report for the financial years 2018-19 and 2019-20.
