Company Law : The analysis clarified that shareholder protection is ensured through ultimate parent consolidation. Hence, intermediate companies...
SEBI : The updated Regulation 23 framework introduces turnover-linked thresholds for related party transactions. Listed companies must re...
Company Law : Courts and regulators now treat related party transactions as a core governance issue rather than procedural compliance. The key t...
SEBI : The regulator upheld a turnover-linked materiality framework for related party transactions, replacing the flat 10% test to align ...
CA, CS, CMA : This case explains why related party transactions require heightened audit scrutiny under SA-550. The key takeaway is that influen...
Company Law : The Ministry of Corporate Affairs details measures to ensure transparency and prevent fund diversion in Related-Party Transactions...
SEBI : SEBI is consulting on amendments to LODR Regulations regarding Related Party Transactions. Proposals include new materiality thres...
Company Law : NFRA highlights auditor responsibilities in related party transactions, emphasizing compliance with Ind AS 24, SEBI regulations, a...
SEBI : SEBI seeks public feedback on strengthening secretarial compliance reports, auditor appointment criteria, and related party transa...
SEBI : What does ‘Where a transaction is undertaken between members of the consolidated entity (between the listed entity and its subsi...
Income Tax : In a landmark ruling, the Delhi High Court held that government shareholders are not automatically considered related parties und...
SEBI : A detailed analysis of SAT Mumbai's decision to reduce SecureKloud Technologies' penalty for non-serious LODR violations, and its ...
Company Law : Bar of voting as per Section 188 of the Companies Act, 2013 on related parties operated only at the time of entering into a contra...
Income Tax : Commissioner issued a show cause notice under section 263 and ultimately passed impugned order; by that time the alleged domestic ...
Company Law : The authority penalized directors for executing related party transactions without fresh or valid approvals. It held that reliance...
Company Law : The company relied on old resolutions for ongoing related party transactions. The authority held that fresh approvals are mandator...
Company Law : The company continued related party transactions based on old approvals. The authority held that fresh approvals are mandatory, le...
Company Law : The issue involved non-compliance with approval requirements for related party transactions. The authority held that absence of Bo...
Company Law : The case addresses non-disclosure of directors’ interests in related entities. Authorities imposed penalties, reinforcing strict...
ICAI’s Disciplinary Committee found CA. Sanjay Mehra guilty of professional misconduct for failing to disclose related-party transactions, leading to a reprimand.
SEBI study reveals 1 in 4 listed companies pay royalty exceeding 20% of net profits to related parties, raising concerns over transparency and governance.
SEBI issues an interpretive letter clarifying related party transaction thresholds for Bajaj Finserv’s subsidiary, impacting insurance and re-insurance agreements.
Adjudication order against CA Niranjan Behera for non-compliance with Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013, related to audit failures for FY 2014-15 & FY 2015-16.
Cryo Scientific Systems Private Limited fined for non-disclosure of related party transactions and remuneration, violating Section 134 of the Companies Act, 2013.
M/s Abu Estate Pvt Ltd fined for violating Section 134(3)(h) of Companies Act, 2013. Penalty imposed for non-compliance during FY 2014-15 to 2017-18.
MCA penalizes Sri Subhalakshmi Infra Pvt Ltd for improper related party disclosures in FY 2014-15 and 2016-17, imposing a total fine of ₹8 lakhs.
Explore compliance of Related Party Transactions under Companies Act, 2013 in Indian public companies. Understand key provisions, challenges, and case studies.
Company earned over 10% of turnover from a related party but failed to get shareholder approval, violating section 188. MCA imposes a penalty.
Tablespace Technologies fined ₹1,00,000 for failing to disclose director’s interests as required by Section 184 of the Companies Act.
