CA, CS, CMA : Focusing only on receivables can miss significant risks embedded in related-party payables. A bilateral review reveals internal gr...
Company Law : The article explains when Audit Committee, Board, and shareholder approvals are required for Related Party Transactions. It provid...
Company Law : The article explains how Audit Committee, Board, and shareholder approvals apply to related party transactions under corporate law...
Company Law : The analysis clarified that shareholder protection is ensured through ultimate parent consolidation. Hence, intermediate companies...
SEBI : The updated Regulation 23 framework introduces turnover-linked thresholds for related party transactions. Listed companies must re...
Company Law : The Ministry of Corporate Affairs details measures to ensure transparency and prevent fund diversion in Related-Party Transactions...
SEBI : SEBI is consulting on amendments to LODR Regulations regarding Related Party Transactions. Proposals include new materiality thres...
Company Law : NFRA highlights auditor responsibilities in related party transactions, emphasizing compliance with Ind AS 24, SEBI regulations, a...
SEBI : SEBI seeks public feedback on strengthening secretarial compliance reports, auditor appointment criteria, and related party transa...
SEBI : What does ‘Where a transaction is undertaken between members of the consolidated entity (between the listed entity and its subsi...
Excise Duty : CESTAT Chandigarh held that the manufacturer and marketing company could not be treated as related persons under the Central Excis...
Income Tax : In a landmark ruling, the Delhi High Court held that government shareholders are not automatically considered related parties und...
SEBI : A detailed analysis of SAT Mumbai's decision to reduce SecureKloud Technologies' penalty for non-serious LODR violations, and its ...
Company Law : Bar of voting as per Section 188 of the Companies Act, 2013 on related parties operated only at the time of entering into a contra...
Income Tax : Commissioner issued a show cause notice under section 263 and ultimately passed impugned order; by that time the alleged domestic ...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai penalised a company and its directors for failing to disclose a related party loan transaction in the Board’s Report ...
Company Law : The authority penalized directors for executing related party transactions without fresh or valid approvals. It held that reliance...
Company Law : The company relied on old resolutions for ongoing related party transactions. The authority held that fresh approvals are mandator...
Company Law : The company continued related party transactions based on old approvals. The authority held that fresh approvals are mandatory, le...
Company Law : The issue involved non-compliance with approval requirements for related party transactions. The authority held that absence of Bo...
Insolvency Professional Ahsan Ahmed penalized Rs. 50,000 by IBBI for assigning voting rights to related parties in SDU Travels Pvt. Ltd. CIRP, violating Section 21(2) of the IBC.
SEBI seeks public feedback on strengthening secretarial compliance reports, auditor appointment criteria, and related party transaction disclosures for listed entities.
Understand Sections 184(2) and 188 of Companies Act, 2013. Learn director disclosure rules, voting restrictions, related party transaction limits, and exemptions.
Registrar of Companies imposes ₹10,00,000 penalty on Watai Electronics and directors for non-compliance with Section 188 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Understand related party transactions, their regulatory framework under the Companies Act and SEBI LODR, and their role in corporate governance and compliance.
ICAI’s Disciplinary Committee found CA. Sanjay Mehra guilty of professional misconduct for failing to disclose related-party transactions, leading to a reprimand.
SEBI study reveals 1 in 4 listed companies pay royalty exceeding 20% of net profits to related parties, raising concerns over transparency and governance.
SEBI issues an interpretive letter clarifying related party transaction thresholds for Bajaj Finserv’s subsidiary, impacting insurance and re-insurance agreements.
Adjudication order against CA Niranjan Behera for non-compliance with Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013, related to audit failures for FY 2014-15 & FY 2015-16.
Cryo Scientific Systems Private Limited fined for non-disclosure of related party transactions and remuneration, violating Section 134 of the Companies Act, 2013.