Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bababhai Sadarbhai Shaikh Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bababhai Sadarbhai Shaikh Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Reassessment Collapses Without 143(2) Notice – ITAT Pune Sends Cash Deposit Case Back to CIT(A) Assessee, a trader in onions & food-grains, had not filed return for AY 2015-16. Based on information from Shri Renuka Mata Multi-State Urban Co-op Credit Society Ltd. about large cash deposits of ₹ 81.03 lakh, AO reopened the case u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B, treating the deposits as unexplained u/s 69A &  assessed total income at ₹ 81.03 lakh. Before CIT(A)/NFAC, Assessee contended that (i) no notice u/s 143(2) was issued, (ii) only 2 days were a...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Patna ITAT: Interest on Delayed Payment of Sales Tax, Service Tax & Employer’s PF Contribution Allowable; TDS Interest Not Deductible Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031