Income Tax : Courts have validated the faceless assessment framework while insisting on strict adherence to fairness. The key takeaway is that ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Court ruled that issuing an SCN before the pre-SCN reply period expires violates natural justice. The key takeaway is that aut...
Goods and Services Tax : The Court held that authorities must provide a personal hearing before issuing adverse GST orders under Section 73. Failure to fol...
CA, CS, CMA : Explains how electronic notices alone are insufficient for taxpayers lacking digital access, with courts holding such service inef...
Goods and Services Tax : Personal hearing is mandatory in GST adjudication under Section 75(4) before any adverse decision. Courts confirm PH is a non-nego...
Goods and Services Tax : The Orissa High Court set aside GST demand and rectification orders after finding that the taxpayer’s reply and request for pers...
Goods and Services Tax : The Telangana High Court set aside the appellate order rejecting the GST appeal and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication aft...
Goods and Services Tax : The Court observed that show cause notices had clearly provided opportunities for personal hearing and submission of documents. It...
Income Tax : The issue concerned taxation of alleged on-money from sale of land. The Tribunal held that once the land was agricultural and outs...
Goods and Services Tax : The case examined whether a GST authority can reject a rectification application without granting a hearing. The High Court set as...
Delhi High Court has set aside the assessment order issued against Dauphin Travel Marketing Private Limited. The main bone of contention was the inadequate response time given to the company to answer a show-cause notice, resulting in a breach of the principles of natural justice.
Analysis and insights into the ITAT Ahmedabad ruling on the appeal of Rameshbhai Patel against the NFAC order regarding unexplained money and procedural errors in the tax assessment for the year 2012-13
Delve into the landmark judgment of the Calcutta High Court in the case of Winsome Highrise Pvt. Ltd Vs Union of India. Unravel the emphasis on principles of natural justice and the consequences on the Indian Income Tax Act.
The recent ITAT Delhi decision in the case of Karamveer Singh Vs ITO emphasises the non-taxability of immovable property bought through funds gifted by relatives. Explore the case’s specifics, implications, and outcomes here.
ITAT Delhi overturns an ex-parte assessment passed under Section 144, citing insufficient opportunity for the assessee. The case is returned to the AO for a re-examination in compliance with the law.
In a significant ruling, ITAT Delhi sets aside the exparte order against Maha Singh, allowing a fresh evaluation of unexplained cash deposits following due principles of natural justice.
Explore the case of Satish vs ACIT where ITAT Delhi quashed an assessment order passed without giving the assessee an opportunity to respond, setting a vital legal precedent.
ITAT Jaipur held that ex-parte order passed without considering and dealing with the submission of the assessee is a non-speaking order. Accordingly, matter remanded.
A detailed overview of ITAT Guwahati’s ruling in the case of S.B. Traders Vs ACIT, where the Tribunal called for re-adjudication due to insufficient opportunity provided to the assessee.
The Delhi High Court has quashed an income tax notice in the case of Jagannath Haldar Through vs. PCIT. The court found that the Assessing Officer (AO) had not taken into account the petitioner’s reply while passing the order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act.
