Income Tax : The Calcutta High Court quashed a Section 143(3) assessment after finding that the assessee was denied a meaningful opportunity of...
Corporate Law : This article examines how natural justice focuses on the fairness of decision-making processes rather than the correctness of outc...
Income Tax : Courts have validated the faceless assessment framework while insisting on strict adherence to fairness. The key takeaway is that ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Court ruled that issuing an SCN before the pre-SCN reply period expires violates natural justice. The key takeaway is that aut...
Goods and Services Tax : The Court held that authorities must provide a personal hearing before issuing adverse GST orders under Section 73. Failure to fol...
Income Tax : The High Court held that an assessment order passed without issuing a show cause notice detailing the proposed additions violated ...
Income Tax : The Madras High Court held that assessment proceedings should include a show cause notice identifying the proposed additions befor...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC quashed the reassessment proceedings after holding that ignoring the assessee's adjournment request violated natural ju...
Income Tax : ITAT remanded the matter after holding that the CIT(A) passed a non-speaking order without giving reasons or properly considering ...
Income Tax : The High Court found that the appellate authority had failed to act on the Tribunal's direction requiring a speaking order for Ass...
CESTAT Ahmedabad directs re-adjudication in the case of Senor Metals Pvt Limited vs. Commissioner of Central Excise & ST. The article discusses the demand of customs duty confirmed for manufacturing dutiable goods on job work basis without disclosing verification report.
The Madras High Court sets aside a GST demand and penalty imposed on M.B.M. Steels for an inward supply from a non-existent supplier without affording them an opportunity to be heard.
Madras High Court sets aside the impugned Assessment order passed on short notice, just two days before the expiry of the notice period. The court rules in favor of the petitioner, citing a violation of principles of natural justice. Read the full analysis here.
Madras High Court sets aside the impugned Assessment order for the Assessment Year 2017-2018, citing lack of adequate opportunity for the petitioner to be heard. The case is remitted back to the respondent to pass a speaking order within 60 days. Read the full analysis here.
Read the full text of ITAT Delhi’s order in the case of Sadhna Goyal vs DCIT, where the appeal was allowed due to a violation of the principle of natural justice.
Delhi High Court sets aside Income Tax Officer’s order for Assessment Year 2016-17, citing failure to consider the taxpayer’s response. Read the full judgment here.
The Delhi High Court recently dealt with two writ petitions (W.P.(C) 6061/2023 and W.P.(C) 6062/2023) concerning Assessment Year (AY) 2016-17. The issue raised in these petitions was similar to the one in another case titled “Harvinder Singh (HUF) v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.
Calcutta High Court asserts that the denial of the opportunity for cross-examination and failure to provide copies of evidence render an order invalid under the Income Tax Act.
Delhi High Court orders a fresh investigation in the Rajnish Yadav Vs ITO case, pertaining to allegations of bogus purchases under the Income Tax Act, citing lack of furnished information to the petitioner.
Delhi High Court has set aside the assessment order issued against Dauphin Travel Marketing Private Limited. The main bone of contention was the inadequate response time given to the company to answer a show-cause notice, resulting in a breach of the principles of natural justice.
