Corporate Law : In the present case, entry by the culprits was by removal of roof sheet which cannot be done without use of force. Hence, it would...
Corporate Law : The Builder will have to refund the amount with interest to Homebuyer if possession of the flat is not given on time. Jaypee Build...
Corporate Law : The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) has ordered to refund of the full amount paid by five homebuyers in a ...
Corporate Law : The Court held that exclusion clause 5 could not justify repudiation of the boiler explosion claim. The insurer cannot rely on pos...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court applied the dominant-purpose principle and concluded that an established company buying specialized process-auto...
Company Law : The NCDRC ruled in favor of SBI Life, stating no insurance contract was formed since the insurer had not communicated its acceptan...
Corporate Law : The NCDRC ruled on a hotel's insurance claim, stating that a surveyor's report is valid unless challenged with credible evidence. ...
Corporate Law : The NCDRC has ruled that a surveyor's report is not binding. The court ordered United India Insurance to pay a ₹3.5 crore claim,...
The Court held that exclusion clause 5 could not justify repudiation of the boiler explosion claim. The insurer cannot rely on post-accident discovery of latent defects to deny a valid claim under a properly issued policy.
The Supreme Court applied the dominant-purpose principle and concluded that an established company buying specialized process-automation software cannot claim it was for personal or self-employment use. The transaction clearly supported larger commercial operations.
The NCDRC ruled in favor of SBI Life, stating no insurance contract was formed since the insurer had not communicated its acceptance before the proposer’s death.
The NCDRC ruled on a hotel’s insurance claim, stating that a surveyor’s report is valid unless challenged with credible evidence. The hotel’s appeal was dismissed.
The NCDRC has ruled that a surveyor’s report is not binding. The court ordered United India Insurance to pay a ₹3.5 crore claim, finding the denial of a fire claim was a deficiency in service.
NCDRC dismisses an appeal from Nancy Overseas, upholding the rejection of an insurance claim due to insufficient premium payment and non-disclosure of material facts.
The NCDRC ruled that a surveyor’s report is a prerequisite but not conclusive for a claim. This decision emphasizes independent evidence over a surveyor’s findings.
Delhi State Consumer Commission dismisses National Insurance Co. appeal due to 54-day delay, citing lack of sufficient cause and judicial precedents on limitation.
Supreme Court held that the penalties imposed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission [NCDRC] are regulatory in nature and do not constitute “debt” under the IBC. Thus, penalty imposed by NCDRC needs to be complied with.
Compensation by its very nature, had to be just. For suffering, no part of which was the claimant-appellant’s own fault, she had been awarded a sum which could, at best, be described as ‘paltry’. In regard to the application of the Eggshell-Skull Rule, the impugned judgment was silent as to how this rule applied to the present case.
