NAA

Profiteering Complaints Adjudicated by NAA In 2018

Goods and Services Tax - During the year 2018, the NAA has passed 28 orders against the complaints referred to it. Following is the gist of NAA Orders issued in 2018. It may be noted that out of 28 Orders, Anti-profiteering could not be established in 18 cases....

Read More

No Profiteering when Base Price is Constant & Selling Price Reduced

Goods and Services Tax - Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal, FCA, FCS The complaint against profiteering came up recently before the National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) in a case involving supply of tiles. In Kerala State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering & DGAP, CBIC New Delhi v. Asian Grantio India Ltd., Ahmedabad, the NAA vide its Order dated 24.12.2018 orde...

Read More

Anti Profiteering Upheld In Noodles Case

Goods and Services Tax - In yet another case where anti-profiteering charges have been established, the National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) has confirmed that sale of Maggie Noodle pack (Noodles) at same price even after rate of GST on it was reduced from 18% to 12% w.e.f. 15 November, 2017 was a case of anti-profiteering u/s 171 of the CGST Act 2017 read ...

Read More

National Anti-Profiteering Authority- Procedure & Methodology

Goods and Services Tax - In exercise of the powers conferred under Rule 126 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Rules, 2017, the National Anti-Profiteering Authority under the Goods & Services Tax hereby notifies the following Methodology and Procedure for determination as to whether the reduction in the rate of tax on the supply of goods or services or [...

Read More

NAA tenure extended for 2 Years; Phased electronic invoicing system introduction; Decision on GSTAT

Goods and Services Tax - The tenure of National Anti-Profiteering Authority has been extended by 2 years. The Council also decided to introduce electronic invoicing system in a phase-wise manner for B2B transactions. E- invoicing is a rapidly expanding technology which would help taxpayers in backward integration and automation of tax relevant processes....

Read More

NAA passes 60 orders against complaints of profiteering

Goods and Services Tax - Anti-Profiteering Measures The National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) was constituted on 28th November, 2017 under Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 to ensure that the reduction in rate of tax or the benefit of input tax credit is passed on to the recipient by way of commensurate reduction in prices. Important steps taken by the NAA ...

Read More

Complaints received by National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) 

Goods and Services Tax - The National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) has been constituted under Section 171 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 to ensure that the reduction in rate of tax or the benefit of input tax credit is passed on to the recipient by way of commensurate reduction in prices. Further, the following steps have been taken by the N...

Read More

No profiteering if No reduction in Tax Rate post-GST period and in absence of additional ITC benefit

Sanjay Devan Vs Vatika Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Appellate Authority) - Sanjay Devan Vs Vatika Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Appellate Authority) The only issue to be examined is as to whether there was any net benefit of ITC with the introduction of GST. On this issue, the DGAP in his Report, has stated that ITC as a percentage of the turnover which was available to...

Read More

Builder Guilty of Profiteering as not passed ITC benefit to Flat Buyers

Sh. Kavi Mahajan Vs M/s Heeranandani Realtors Pvt. Ltd (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) - Sh. Kavi Mahajan Vs M/s Heeranandani Realtors Pvt. Ltd (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) Respondent has benefited from the additional ITC to the extent of 10.66% of the turnover during the period from July, 2017 to August, 2918 and hence the provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 have ...

Read More

Builder guilty of profiteering as not passed additional ITC benefit to buyers

Sh. Rohit Singh Vs M/s Friends Land Developers (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) - Sh. Rohit Singh Vs Friends Land Developers (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) During the pre-GST period the Respondent has availed CENVAT credit on the Service Tax during the pre-GST period from April. 2016 to June. 2017 amounting to Rs 52,11,867/-, collected an amount of Rs. 12,31,99.617/- from...

Read More

Builder profiteered by not passing ITC benefit to flat purchasers

Mr. Gopinath Dombla Vs M/s Navkar Associates (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) - It is clear from the plain reading of Section 171(1) mentioned above that it deals with two situations one relating to the passing on the benefit of reduction in the rate of tax and the second pertaining to the passing on the benefit of the ITC....

Read More

Developer not passed additional ITC benefit to buyers post-GST implementation: NAA

Shri. Abhishek Vs M/s Signature Global Developers Pvt. Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) - It it is revealed that the Respondent is executing his Synera project under the Affordable Housing Scheme approved by the Government of Haryana under the Prime Minister Awas Yojana and is constructing both the residential and commercial accommodation....

Read More

CBIC Field formations to also defend cases on behalf of NAA (GST)

F.No.280/26/2018-CX.8A - (23/10/2018) - Field formations shall henceforth, also defend the cases on behalf of National Anti‑profiteering Authority (GST), New Delhi pending before the Hon'ble courts....

Read More

NAA’s Popular Posts

Recent Posts in "NAA"

No profiteering if No reduction in Tax Rate post-GST period and in absence of additional ITC benefit

Sanjay Devan Vs Vatika Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Appellate Authority)

Sanjay Devan Vs Vatika Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Appellate Authority) The only issue to be examined is as to whether there was any net benefit of ITC with the introduction of GST. On this issue, the DGAP in his Report, has stated that ITC as a percentage of the turnover which was available to the Respondent […]...

Read More

Builder Guilty of Profiteering as not passed ITC benefit to Flat Buyers

Sh. Kavi Mahajan Vs M/s Heeranandani Realtors Pvt. Ltd (National Anti-Profiteering Authority)

Sh. Kavi Mahajan Vs M/s Heeranandani Realtors Pvt. Ltd (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) Respondent has benefited from the additional ITC to the extent of 10.66% of the turnover during the period from July, 2017 to August, 2918 and hence the provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 have been contravened by the Respondent as [&...

Read More

Builder guilty of profiteering as not passed additional ITC benefit to buyers

Sh. Rohit Singh Vs M/s Friends Land Developers (National Anti-Profiteering Authority)

Sh. Rohit Singh Vs Friends Land Developers (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) During the pre-GST period the Respondent has availed CENVAT credit on the Service Tax during the pre-GST period from April. 2016 to June. 2017 amounting to Rs 52,11,867/-, collected an amount of Rs. 12,31,99.617/- from his customers as turnover, has sold an ...

Read More

Builder profiteered by not passing ITC benefit to flat purchasers

Mr. Gopinath Dombla Vs M/s Navkar Associates (National Anti-Profiteering Authority)

It is clear from the plain reading of Section 171(1) mentioned above that it deals with two situations one relating to the passing on the benefit of reduction in the rate of tax and the second pertaining to the passing on the benefit of the ITC....

Read More

Developer not passed additional ITC benefit to buyers post-GST implementation: NAA

Shri. Abhishek Vs M/s Signature Global Developers Pvt. Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority)

It it is revealed that the Respondent is executing his Synera project under the Affordable Housing Scheme approved by the Government of Haryana under the Prime Minister Awas Yojana and is constructing both the residential and commercial accommodation....

Read More

Seller guilty of not passing ITC Benefit to Customers on Sanitary Napkin

Sh. Sandeep Puri Vs M/s. Johnson & Johnson (National Anti-Profiteering Authority)

It is also evident from above narration of facts that Respondent has denied benefit of rate reduction to buyers of product Sanitary Napkin in contravention of the provisions of Section 171 (1) of the CGST Act, 2017 and has thus resorted to profiteering, which is an offence under section 171 (3A) of the CGST Act, 2017...

Read More

Builder found Guilty of Not Passing Benefit of Pre-GST ITC

Sh. Paval Antony Vs M/s Shree Mahalakshmi Enterprises (National Anti-Profiteering Authority)

During the pre-GST period from April. 2016 to June, 2017 the Respondent was paying tax @ 6% which was increased to 18% during the post-GST period and hence there was increase in the rate of tax and therefore, the Respondent is not liable to pay the benefit of tax reduction to his customers...

Read More

Gurugram Builder found guilty of not passing ITC Benefit to Flat Buyers

Ms. Santosh Kumar & Others Vs M/s Aster Infrahome Pvt. Ltd, (National Anti-Profiteering Authority)

NAA carefully considered the Report of the DGAP, submissions made by the Respondent and based on the record it is revealed that the above Applicants had purchased flats from the Respondent in his Green Court project situated in Sector 90, Gurugram, Haryana which was got approved by him under the Affordable Housing Policy-2013 of the Gover...

Read More

NAA found Builder guilty of not passing benefit of ITC to buyers of flats

Shri Diwakar Bansal Vs M/s Horizon Projects Pvt. Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority)

Respondent has denied benefit of ITC to the buyers of the flats being constructed by him in his 'Runwal My City' Project in contravention of the provisions of Section 171 (1) of the CGST Act, 2017 and has thus profiteered an amount of Rs. 3,20,49,507/- from his customers, hence he has committed an offence under section 171 (3A) of the CGS...

Read More

NAA found builder guilty of denying benefit of ITC to buyers of flats

Shri Hardev Singh Vs M/s Ocean Seven Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority)

Shri Hardev Singh Vs M/s Ocean Seven Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) As per the payment schedule, buyers had to pay 5% of the total amount at the time of booking, i.e. at the time of submission of the application for allotment and the first draw for allotment was held on 31.03.2017 during the […]...

Read More

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (4,375)
Company Law (5,170)
Custom Duty (7,494)
DGFT (4,051)
Excise Duty (4,279)
Fema / RBI (3,902)
Finance (4,053)
Income Tax (31,258)
SEBI (3,249)
Service Tax (3,483)

Search Posts by Date

December 2019
M T W T F S S
« Nov    
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031