NAA

Profiteering Complaints Adjudicated by NAA In 2018

Goods and Services Tax - During the year 2018, the NAA has passed 28 orders against the complaints referred to it. Following is the gist of NAA Orders issued in 2018. It may be noted that out of 28 Orders, Anti-profiteering could not be established in 18 cases....

Read More

No Profiteering when Base Price is Constant & Selling Price Reduced

Goods and Services Tax - Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal, FCA, FCS The complaint against profiteering came up recently before the National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) in a case involving supply of tiles. In Kerala State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering & DGAP, CBIC New Delhi v. Asian Grantio India Ltd., Ahmedabad, the NAA vide its Order dated 24.12.2018 orde...

Read More

Anti Profiteering Upheld In Noodles Case

Goods and Services Tax - In yet another case where anti-profiteering charges have been established, the National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) has confirmed that sale of Maggie Noodle pack (Noodles) at same price even after rate of GST on it was reduced from 18% to 12% w.e.f. 15 November, 2017 was a case of anti-profiteering u/s 171 of the CGST Act 2017 read ...

Read More

National Anti-Profiteering Authority- Procedure & Methodology

Goods and Services Tax - In exercise of the powers conferred under Rule 126 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Rules, 2017, the National Anti-Profiteering Authority under the Goods & Services Tax hereby notifies the following Methodology and Procedure for determination as to whether the reduction in the rate of tax on the supply of goods or services or [...

Read More

NAA tenure extended for 2 Years; Phased electronic invoicing system introduction; Decision on GSTAT

Goods and Services Tax - The tenure of National Anti-Profiteering Authority has been extended by 2 years. The Council also decided to introduce electronic invoicing system in a phase-wise manner for B2B transactions. E- invoicing is a rapidly expanding technology which would help taxpayers in backward integration and automation of tax relevant processes....

Read More

NAA passes 60 orders against complaints of profiteering

Goods and Services Tax - Anti-Profiteering Measures The National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) was constituted on 28th November, 2017 under Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 to ensure that the reduction in rate of tax or the benefit of input tax credit is passed on to the recipient by way of commensurate reduction in prices. Important steps taken by the NAA ...

Read More

Complaints received by National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) 

Goods and Services Tax - The National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) has been constituted under Section 171 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 to ensure that the reduction in rate of tax or the benefit of input tax credit is passed on to the recipient by way of commensurate reduction in prices. Further, the following steps have been taken by the N...

Read More

Vijetha Supermarkets guilty of profiteering: NAA

Shri M. Srinivas Vs Vijetha Supermarkets Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) - Shri M. Srinivas Vs Vijetha Supermarkets Pvt. Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) The Applicant had alleged that the Respondent had not reduced the selling price of the “Frozen Green Peas”, when the GST rate was reduced from 5 % to Nil w.e.f. 01.01.2019 with denial of Input Tax C...

Read More

Pivotal Infrastructure guilty of profiteering; Pass ITC benefit to Customers: NAA

Smt. Honey Macker Vs M/s Pivotal Infrastructure Pvt Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) - Smt. Honey Macker Vs M/s Pivotal Infrastructure Pvt Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) Applicants, the Respondent and the other material placed on record and find that the Applicant No. 1 vide her complaint dated 03.08.2018 had alleged that the Respondent was not passing on the benefit of I...

Read More

EMAAR MGF guilty of profiteering of Rs. 19 crores: NAA

Sh. Puneet Bansal Vs Emaar MGF Land Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) - Sh. Puneet Bansal Vs Emaar MGF Land Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) It is established from the perusal of the above facts that the Respondent has benefited from the additional ITC to the extent of 8.73% of the turnover during the period from July, 2017 to March, 2019 and hence the provis...

Read More

Builder denied ITC benefit Flat buyers- Guilty profiteering- NAA

Shri Kamal Nayan Singhania Vs Elegant Properties (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) - Shri Kamal Nayan Singhania Vs Elegant Properties (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) In this case Respondent has profiteered by an amount of Rs. 1,42,369/- during the period of investigation. Therefore, this Authority under Rule 133 (3) (a) of the CGST Rules, 2017 orders that the Respondent shall...

Read More

NAA directs builder to pass on benefit of ITC to Flat Buyers

Amarjeet Singh Yadav Vs Radicon Infrastructure & Housing Private Limited (NAA) - Amarjeet Singh Yadav Vs Radicon Infrastructure & Housing Private Limited (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) National Anti-Profiteering Authority hereby determines the profiteered amount as Rs. 40,92,054/- in terms of Rule 133 (1) of the CGST Rules, 2017 and directs the Respondent to pass on ...

Read More

CBIC Field formations to also defend cases on behalf of NAA (GST)

F.No.280/26/2018-CX.8A - (23/10/2018) - Field formations shall henceforth, also defend the cases on behalf of National Anti‑profiteering Authority (GST), New Delhi pending before the Hon'ble courts....

Read More

Recent Posts in "NAA"

Vijetha Supermarkets guilty of profiteering: NAA

Shri M. Srinivas Vs Vijetha Supermarkets Pvt. Ltd. (NAA)

Shri M. Srinivas Vs Vijetha Supermarkets Pvt. Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) The Applicant had alleged that the Respondent had not reduced the selling price of the “Frozen Green Peas”, when the GST rate was reduced from 5 % to Nil w.e.f. 01.01.2019 with denial of Input Tax Credit, vide Notification No. 25/2018-Cen...

Read More

Pivotal Infrastructure guilty of profiteering; Pass ITC benefit to Customers: NAA

Smt. Honey Macker Vs M/s Pivotal Infrastructure Pvt Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority)

Smt. Honey Macker Vs M/s Pivotal Infrastructure Pvt Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) Applicants, the Respondent and the other material placed on record and find that the Applicant No. 1 vide her complaint dated 03.08.2018 had alleged that the Respondent was not passing on the benefit of ITC to her in spite of the fact that [&he...

Read More

EMAAR MGF guilty of profiteering of Rs. 19 crores: NAA

Sh. Puneet Bansal Vs Emaar MGF Land Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority)

Sh. Puneet Bansal Vs Emaar MGF Land Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) It is established from the perusal of the above facts that the Respondent has benefited from the additional ITC to the extent of 8.73% of the turnover during the period from July, 2017 to March, 2019 and hence the provisions of Section 171 of […]...

Read More

Builder denied ITC benefit Flat buyers- Guilty profiteering- NAA

Shri Kamal Nayan Singhania Vs Elegant Properties (National Anti-Profiteering Authority)

Shri Kamal Nayan Singhania Vs Elegant Properties (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) In this case Respondent has profiteered by an amount of Rs. 1,42,369/- during the period of investigation. Therefore, this Authority under Rule 133 (3) (a) of the CGST Rules, 2017 orders that the Respondent shall reduce the prices to be realized from t...

Read More

NAA directs builder to pass on benefit of ITC to Flat Buyers

Amarjeet Singh Yadav Vs Radicon Infrastructure & Housing Private Limited (NAA)

Amarjeet Singh Yadav Vs Radicon Infrastructure & Housing Private Limited (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) National Anti-Profiteering Authority hereby determines the profiteered amount as Rs. 40,92,054/- in terms of Rule 133 (1) of the CGST Rules, 2017 and directs the Respondent to pass on the benefit of Rs. 6,982/- [21,496 – 1...

Read More

Whirlpool found guilty of profiteering by NAA

Kerala State Screening Committee on Anti Profiteering Vs Whirlpool of India Ltd. (NAA)

Kerala State Screening Committee on Anti Profiteering Vs Whirlpool of India Ltd. (NAA) NAA determines amount profiteered by Whirlpool  at Rs. 4,07,451/- and directed Whirlpool  to reduce the price of Refrigerator Whirlpool (HSN code 84182100) as per the provisions of Rule 133 (3) (a) of the CGST Rules, 2017, keeping in view the reductio...

Read More

No Profiteering if no reduction in Tax tax or increase in ITC benefit

Shri Kapil Dev Sharma Vs Director General of Anti-Profiteering (NAA)

Shri Kapil Dev Sharma Vs Director General of Anti-Profiteering (NAA) The DGAP has further reported that Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 came into play in the event where there was a reduction in the rate of tax or there was an increase in the benefit of ITC. In the present case, since the […]...

Read More

NAA upheld profiteering allegation in respect of Fogg Deo supplied to Big Bazar

Sh. Rahul Sharma Vs Tanya Enterprises (NAA)

Rahul Sharma Vs Tanya Enterprises (NAA) The brief facts of the case are that the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering vide its communication dated 11.03.2019 had requested the DGAP to conduct a detailed investigation as per Rule 129 (1) of the above Rules on the allegation that M/s Vini Cosmetics Pvt. Ltd. had not passed on […]...

Read More

GST NAA finds Philips India guilty of profiteering on Food Processor

Kerala State Level Screening Committee on Anti-Profiteering Vs Phillips India Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority)

Kerala State Level Screening Committee on Anti-Profiteering Vs Phillips India Ltd. (NAA) The brief facts of the case are that the Applicant No. 1 vide the minutes of its meeting held on 08.05.2018 had referred the present case to the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, alleging profiteering by the Respondent on the supply of “F...

Read More

Emaar MGF to refund profiteered amount to 1239 homebuyers: NAA

Sh. Rahul Kumar Vs. M/s Emaar MGF Land Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority)

Rahul Kumar Vs. Emaar MGF Land Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) The brief facts of the case are that vide his application dated 07.01.2019 filed before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering under Rule 128 (1) of the CGST Rules, 2017, the Applicant No. 1 had alleged profiteering by the Respondent in respect of purchase of ...

Read More

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (4,798)
Company Law (6,144)
Custom Duty (7,793)
DGFT (4,244)
Excise Duty (4,368)
Fema / RBI (4,240)
Finance (4,445)
Income Tax (33,445)
SEBI (3,519)
Service Tax (3,564)

Search Posts by Date

July 2020
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031