#ITAT Judgments
Log in to FollowLatest ITAT Judgments updates, provisions, case laws, compliance requirements, tax implications and expert analysis under Income-tax law on TaxGuru.

Belated appeal before CIT(A) dismissed without an opportunity of being heard not justified

Excess interest charged due to wrong due date deleted: ITAT Delhi

Reassessment quashed as reasons supplied to assessee & to higher forum were not same

Appeal by revenue having tax effect below prescribed monetary limit not maintainable

Addition u/s. 69 on protective basis not justified as genuineness of transaction established

Ex-parte order confirming addition of entire cash deposits during demonetization not justified

Addition u/s. 69C deleted as outstanding trade creditors clearly established: ITAT Chennai

Compensation for cancelling allotment due to non-delivery in time is capital receipt

GST not includible while computing presumptive income u/s. 44B: ITAT Mumbai

Addition u/s. 69A to extent of redeposit of cash withdrawn untenable: ITAT Bangalore

Addition u/s. 43CA deleted by taking stamp duty value on date of registration of agreement

Delay of around 6 years condoned since bonafide belief is sufficient cause: ITAT Bangalore

Matter remitted to CIT(A) as condonation application dismissed without considering reasons

Order u/s. 201(1) passed beyond prescribed time limit untenable: ITAT Delhi
Explore the latest ITAT Judgments updates on TaxGuru, including relevant Income-tax Act provisions, rules, notifications, circulars, judicial decisions and compliance guidance. The coverage highlights important tax positions, procedural requirements, assessments, deductions, penalties and litigation developments to help taxpayers and professionals understand the practical implications of changes in income-tax law.
